Launched this week
PureBox.ai
Review-first AI cleanup for your real Gmail inbox.
150 followers
Review-first AI cleanup for your real Gmail inbox.
150 followers
Most inbox tools make you build rules first. PureBox skips that - it's personalized from your first scan using AI and your own Gmail history (which senders you open, reply to, or let pile up), so suggestions fit your routine on day one. Every suggestion shows why, and nothing moves until you approve - no black box, no silent deletions. It surfaces what needs your attention, not just what to trash. Your data is never sold; Pro subscriptions fund it.
@shaked_i Quick question: how does PureBox.ai handle edge cases like important automated emails that look similar to promos or newsletters? I’d love to hear what protections you’ve added so those never get mistakenly archived or trashed.
Review-first is the right call. Most inbox AI I've tried loses my trust the first time it quietly archives something that actually mattered. How do you handle the gray-zone stuff, like a cold pitch that's genuinely relevant versus noise? Is the review queue learning per-user, or are the rules more global at the start?
Shaked, the origin story is the strongest part of this page, and review-first reads like a decision you made for yourself rather than for the launch.
One case nobody raised: a small clinic inbox is full of patients writing about symptoms and lab results, so your first scan is processing regulated data. The question there is not retention (Chalermpon and Gal already covered that one), it is who counts as the processor. That inbox owner needs a signed agreement covering you and whichever model provider you call, otherwise they cannot connect at all.
Is the provider behind the sorting one you could sign that with? Solo therapists have the worst inboxes I have seen and almost no tool they are allowed to touch.
the 30 day trash grace period is a smart touch, most people won't trust an AI email tool until there's a real undo. one thing I'm curious about - once something gets filed to Archive, does it stay just as searchable as normal gmail archive, or does the LLM sorting change how findable stuff like old invoices/contracts is later?
The review-first approach makes sense for rebuilding trust. How does PureBox handle borderline emails when its confidence is low, and does it learn from approvals or corrections over time?
I honestly have around 5k of unread emails, but I like the fact that nothing gets deleted automatically. How long did it take before you were comfortable relying on your own product?
Congrats on the launch! The three-bucket plus reasoning approach is a smart way to keep trust intact, most inbox cleanup tools break it the moment they act silently on something that mattered.
Before I'd trust it with my own Gmail, I'm curious what happens to an email's content after it goes through the model to generate the category and explanation, whether it's discarded right after the suggestion is shown or logged somewhere on your end. That distinction would decide whether I connect a real inbox to it.