LLMOlytic

How GPT-4o, Claude & Gemini understand your website

10 followers

Visit website
LLMOlytic shows how GPT-4o, Claude and Gemini understand your website — and gives you a 0–100 LLM visibility score. AI models are becoming new discovery engines: if they don’t recognize your site, you won’t appear in their recommendations. Enter a URL and get a structured analysis across 5 blocks: Knowledge, Functionality, Competitive Positioning, Sector Relevance and Perceived Quality. Try your first scan free.
LLMOlytic gallery image
LLMOlytic gallery image
LLMOlytic gallery image
Free Options
Launch tags:Marketing•Developer Tools•Artificial Intelligence
Launch Team / Built With
ace.me
ace.me
Your new website, email address & cloud storage
Promoted

What do you think? …

Masaneth
Maker
📌
I built LLMOlytic after noticing the same pattern across my own projects and several clients sites: A growing amount of traffic wasn’t coming from Google anymore… it was coming from ChatGPT and other LLMs. But the problem was: I had no idea how these models actually understood (or misunderstood) our websites. Sometimes GPT thought we were in the wrong category. Sometimes Claude didn’t recognize the brand at all. Sometimes Gemini recommended competitors… but not us. So I built LLMOlytic to measure this “LLM visibility” with a consistent, structured method instead of random manual prompts. Everyone gets a free partial report — (no credit card). I’d love your feedback. — More features are already cooking → https://llmolytic.com Thanks for checking this out! Happy to answer anything about how it works under the hood
Masum Parvej

@masaneth Congrats on launching this!

Michael Schreier

Like the idea! 👍

One piece of feedback: I'd love to test it without creating an account first. Let me paste a URL, see the analysis, and THEN ask me to sign up when I want to save results or access advanced features.

The best products earn your email by showing value upfront - they don't demand it at the door.

Masaneth
Maker

@indiemiguel Thank you very much for the feedback. I will implement that. You're right, I should show the result, and if the result is good, I'll earn the email. That will be the next change.

Berkin Sili
Just tried the free report, really cool idea and the structured approach makes way more sense than doing random prompt tests manually. I had a quick question about the full analysis: does it include any actionable steps or recommendations on how to improve LLM visibility? Also curious about the logic behind your scoring, how much of it is model-based vs rule-based? Super interesting space, congrats on shipping this!