Launched this week
Jurowl

Jurowl

4 AI lawyers debate your contract. You get the verdict.

7 followers

Visit website
Contracts are designed to confuse. Lawyers charge $300-500/hour to explain them. Jurowl gives the same clarity for free. Upload any contract — freelance agreements, NDAs, service terms — and four AI experts analyze it from every angle. Risk Hunter finds liability traps. Fairness Guardian flags one-sided terms. Industry Expert spots non-standard clauses. Deal Closer writes the exact words to push back. One upload, four perspectives, one clear verdict. Free to start. No credit card needed.
Jurowl gallery image
Jurowl gallery image
Jurowl gallery image
Jurowl gallery image
Jurowl gallery image
Jurowl gallery image
Free Options
Launch tags:Productivity•Legal•Artificial Intelligence
Launch Team / Built With
Universal-3 Pro by AssemblyAI
Universal-3 Pro by AssemblyAI
The first promptable speech model for production
Promoted

What do you think? …

Ertugrul Kutluer
Maker
📌
Hey everyone! We're a two-person team behind Jurowl. We've all been there — a contract lands in your inbox, 12 pages of legal jargon, and a deadline to sign. Hiring a lawyer costs $300-500/hour just to review it. Most people just sign and hope for the best. We thought: what if AI could do this? But not just one AI giving one opinion. Four AI experts, each with a different perspective, debating the contract and reaching a consensus. That's Jurowl. Upload any contract and the AI Council goes to work: - Risk Hunter obsessively searches for liability traps - Fairness Guardian ensures both parties are treated equally - Industry Expert knows what's standard and what's unusual - Deal Closer gives the exact words to negotiate better terms Each agent finds issues, scores the risk, and gives actionable advice. The result: a clear verdict with negotiation scripts ready to use. Free plan: 1 analysis per day, no credit card. Pro: $3.99/month for unlimited analyses (early pricing — won't last). Would love feedback — especially from freelancers and founders who deal with contracts regularly. What would make this more useful?