Launched this week
Connector.wtf
Plug Google Ads, Meta & LinkedIn into your AI chat. Free
35 followers
Plug Google Ads, Meta & LinkedIn into your AI chat. Free
35 followers
Plug Google Ads, Meta & LinkedIn into your favorite AI chat...for Free! Connector.wtf is a free, read-only MCP server that plugs your ad accounts directly into ChatGPT or Claude. Currently live: Google Ads, Meta Ads, and LinkedIn Ads. More connectors are on the way we're building the ones our agency and our clients actually use. Free, because hosting it for the world costs roughly nothing and the alternative is everyone wrestling with CSV exports for the rest of their lives.
Connector.wtf
Read-only is the right call for now. At our IT services company we ran Google and LinkedIn ads across multiple client accounts — the data fragmentation was genuinely painful. A founder asking "why did my LinkedIn CPL spike last week" and getting a real answer without exporting CSVs is legitimately valuable. Question: when you eventually consider write capabilities, how are you thinking about guardrails? Budget changes in ad platforms can be catastrophic.
Connector.wtf
@thekrew Yeah, the "why did my LinkedIn CPL spike last week" question is exactly the use case that made me build this. It's a 4-hour answer if you do it properly across exports, and a 4-minute answer with the AI in the loop. Founders should not have to pay for the 4-hour version.
On guardrails for write this is the part I've thought about most, because you're right, the catastrophic version is very catastrophic. A daily budget typo turning into a 10× overspend before anyone notices is not a hypothetical, it's a Tuesday at someone's agency.
My current thinking (subject to change as I actually test it):
Always human-approved, no exceptions. AI proposes one specific change with a clear "why." Human clicks approve or reject. The AI never gets a "you have authority to act on suggestions like this in the future" mode. Every action is a separate decision.
Bounded by hard limits. Even on approval, certain changes need extra friction — anything that touches daily budget by more than X %, anything that pauses a campaign over a certain spend threshold, anything that affects more than N keywords at once. These aren't "AI guardrails," they're the same kind of limits any sensible agency already puts on junior media buyers.
Reversible by default. Every approved action logs the before-state so you can roll it back with one click. If the AI suggested pausing 20 keywords and it turns out 3 of them were actually performing fine in the long tail, undoing should not require reconstructing what was changed from memory.
Read-only stays read-only for the destructive stuff. Budget changes, campaign deletion, audience deletion I'm honestly not sure these should ever route through chat at all, even with approvals. The cost of a mistake is too asymmetric vs the time saved. Some workflows belong in the platform UI where the friction is the feature.
The biggest risk I see isn't bad AI suggestions it's good AI suggestions that arrive faster than humans can evaluate them. If you're approving 30 changes a day, by suggestion 25 you're rubber-stamping. So whatever shape write-access takes, it has to slow the human down at the right moments, not just hand them a queue of approvals.
Open question, genuinely curious what you'd want. From your agency experience what's the one write-action you'd actually trust the AI with, and what's the one you'd never let it touch even with approvals?
Hey guys, I noticed on the app that we were able to connect our Google Ads account through your MCP integration without any issues, which was great.
However, when looking at the Meta Ads section, it looks like the setup currently advises connecting directly through Facebook’s own MCP integration instead.
The only issue for us is that here in Australia we still don’t seem to have access to the Meta/Facebook MCP rollout yet, as it appears to still be gradually rolling out since May.
Just wondering if there’s any alternative way to access Meta Ads through your MCP integration, similar to how the Google Ads connection works on your platform?
Would love to know if there’s a workaround or if this is something planned for wider availability soon. Thanks!
Connector.wtf
@fraser_mc Hey, great timing on this question...short version:
we paused our own Meta connector when Facebook launched theirs, but we're back on it.
Here's the longer version:
When Meta released their own official MCP, we figured (reasonably, we thought) that building a competing version would be redundant. Why duplicate something the platform owner is shipping themselves? So we pointed users to Facebook's MCP instead.
Then we started getting messages like yours. And when we looked at our own accounts, we noticed the same thing only a small fraction of Meta accounts actually have access to Facebook's MCP.
The rollout has been much slower than the we tought. Australia, most of Europe, and a lot of US accounts are still waiting. Some accounts that should have it based on region don't have it. The whole thing has been opaque.
So we restarted our own Meta connector. It's built and submitted to Meta for app review which is the part we can't speed up. Once it's approved, we'll roll it out to everyone immediately, regardless of region. No "gradual rollout."
— Tommi
Connector.wtf
Quick update for everyone who asked "what's next" the answer is "a lot, and faster than I expected."
Currently live, all free:
🟢 Google Ads the original
🟢 LinkedIn Ads
🟢 LinkedIn Ad Library
🟢 Search Console find SEO/SEM cannibalization in seconds
🟢 WooCommerce actual revenue data so the AI can correlate ad spend with what sold
🟢 HubSpot CRM data, finally in the same conversation as ad performance
🟡 GA4 coming soon, this is the one most people asked for
The cross-platform stuff is where it gets fun. Some questions that suddenly become trivial:
"Which keywords are we paying for in Google Ads while already ranking organically in Search Console? Pause the overlap?"
"Compare CPA in Meta vs LinkedIn for the same conversion. Which platform is actually cheaper per qualified lead from HubSpot?"
"Which WooCommerce SKUs are driving most of the revenue from our Google Ads spend? Are we bidding on the right products?"
None of these need 4 separate dashboards anymore. Just one chat.
articuler.ai
"The alternative is everyone wrestling with CSV exports for the rest of their lives" okay this is the realest sentence in any launch I've read today 😂
Read-only is the right call right now btw — anyone who's seen what an over-confident LLM does with write access to a $50K Meta campaign understands why. Curious where you take it from here though — once the trust is there, do you eventually want to let people do things from chat, or is the vibe forever "we tell you what's broken, you go fix it"?
Either way, plugging ad platforms into chat for free is the kind of thing the whole industry should have built two years ago. Upvoted 🚀
Connector.wtf
@jason_shen3 Ha, thank you 😄 that sentence wrote itself after the 400th CSV export.
And honestly your last line is exactly why I built this. It should have existed two years ago. The fact that nobody had made a free one is the only reason I'm sitting here typing this instead of paying for someone else's tool.
On the over-confident LLM thing: yeah, anyone who's watched an AI confidently "optimize" something it didn't understand knows exactly why read-only matters. I've seen Claude suggest pausing a campaign because the conversion column was zero, not realizing the column was zero because the conversion tracking was broken, not the campaign. Imagine if it had been able to act on that.
On where it goes: my honest take is that even if write-access becomes part of the picture, it should always go through a human first. Not "AI runs your ads while you sleep" but AI proposes specific, narrow changes ("pause this one keyword that spent €800 with zero conversions, here's why") and a human clicks approve or reject.
What I think is realistic before that, and probably more valuable anyway: read-only across more surfaces (GA4, Search Console, CRM data) so the AI can correlate things humans rarely have time to correlate. AI checks the ad account, the landing page analytics, AND the CRM. That kind of cross-platform diagnosis is what dashboards will never do and you don't need write-access to deliver 80% of the value.
Appreciate the upvote 🙏
Read-only and free is a solid combo for getting agencies to actually connect their ad accounts.
Most tools want write access on day one and that's where people bounce 👍
Connector.wtf
@romain_delgado most of the "AI optimization" SaaS tools could probably ship a read-only version of themselves and 10x their signups overnight. Anyway most of the magic is just access to the data.