AI tool to summarize academic articles and PDFs in seconds. Perfect for researchers, lawyers, and consultants who spend hours reading documents. Upload PDF → Get instant summary with key points, conclusions, and keywords. Free plan available. Pricing from $5-20/month.
No reviews yetBe the first to leave a review for ResumaChat
Maker
📌
Hi Product Hunt! 👋
I launched ResumáChat - an AI tool to summarize academic articles and PDFs in seconds.
🎯 The Problem:
Researchers, lawyers, and consultants waste ~10 hours/week reading long documents. It's exhausting.
✨ The Solution:
Upload a PDF → ResumáChat generates a structured summary in 30 seconds.
No complexity, no mandatory subscriptions.
📊 How It Works:
1. Upload a PDF (up to 50MB)
2. Our AI (Claude) analyzes the document
3. Get a complete summary with:
- Executive summary
- Key points
- Conclusions
- Keywords
💰 Plans:
- **Free**: $0/month (5 summaries/month)
- **Basic**: $5/month (50 summaries/month)
- **Professional**: $20/month (unlimited)
🚀 Tech:
Built with Claude AI (Anthropic), Node.js, and deployed on Vercel.
I'm in open beta! Feedback is gold.
👉 Test it free: https://resumachat.com
Report
Honestly impressed by how clean the key points extraction is on dense legal docs, saved me a good chunk of time today.
Report
Maker
@cemileykc0 Good to hear, legal docs tend to be dense in a very different way from academic papers, so it's reassuring that the extraction holds up there too. Appreciate you trying it out!
Report
honestly this looks super useful for my research workflow, but one thing that would make it way better is letting me compare summaries across multiple uploaded papers side by side, kind of like a mini lit review view. would save me tons of time when checking how different studies approach the same topic
Report
Maker
@golgelisem16238 Really like this idea — a lit-review style view comparing multiple papers side by side would be huge for research use cases specifically. Adding it to my list, thanks for the detailed suggestion 🙏
Report
Would love to see a side-by-side comparison view that highlights where the AI's summary deviates from the original text, makes verifying accuracy way easier when I'm dealing with dense legal PDFs and need to trust the conclusions it pulls out.
Report
Maker
@evvalmehmewsvh That's a great callout, and honestly a fair ask — when you're citing something from a legal doc you need to trust it's not paraphrasing away nuance. A side-by-side verification view makes a lot of sense, noting it down.
Report
Finally tried it on a dense 40-page legal brief and the key points it pulled were actually useful, not just generic fluff. The keyword section alone saved me a solid chunk of time.
Report
Maker
@bayrakllar20010 Good to hear the keyword extraction actually pulled its weight on a legal doc, that's exactly the kind of feedback I needed. Legal briefs are dense in a different way than academic papers, so glad it held up.
Report
Solid tool for skimming dense papers quickly. Uploaded a 40-page legal brief and got a usable summary with the key arguments pulled out in under a minute.
Report
Maker
@nazlcan1332465 Nice, glad it held up on something that dense. Under a minute for a 40-pager is roughly what I'm aiming for, good to see it holding in practice.
Report
Tried it on a 40-page legal brief and the key points section actually picked up the arguments I needed to cite. Wish it had a side-by-side view with the original PDF, but the speed alone is worth the $5.
Report
Maker
@ebruhbfq Appreciate the honest take. The side-by-side view keeps coming up (a couple others mentioned it too), so it's clearly worth prioritizing. Glad the speed made it worth it either way!
Honestly impressed by how clean the key points extraction is on dense legal docs, saved me a good chunk of time today.
@cemileykc0 Good to hear, legal docs tend to be dense in a very different way from academic papers, so it's reassuring that the extraction holds up there too. Appreciate you trying it out!
honestly this looks super useful for my research workflow, but one thing that would make it way better is letting me compare summaries across multiple uploaded papers side by side, kind of like a mini lit review view. would save me tons of time when checking how different studies approach the same topic
@golgelisem16238 Really like this idea — a lit-review style view comparing multiple papers side by side would be huge for research use cases specifically. Adding it to my list, thanks for the detailed suggestion 🙏
Would love to see a side-by-side comparison view that highlights where the AI's summary deviates from the original text, makes verifying accuracy way easier when I'm dealing with dense legal PDFs and need to trust the conclusions it pulls out.
@evvalmehmewsvh That's a great callout, and honestly a fair ask — when you're citing something from a legal doc you need to trust it's not paraphrasing away nuance. A side-by-side verification view makes a lot of sense, noting it down.
Finally tried it on a dense 40-page legal brief and the key points it pulled were actually useful, not just generic fluff. The keyword section alone saved me a solid chunk of time.
@bayrakllar20010 Good to hear the keyword extraction actually pulled its weight on a legal doc, that's exactly the kind of feedback I needed. Legal briefs are dense in a different way than academic papers, so glad it held up.
Solid tool for skimming dense papers quickly. Uploaded a 40-page legal brief and got a usable summary with the key arguments pulled out in under a minute.
@nazlcan1332465 Nice, glad it held up on something that dense. Under a minute for a 40-pager is roughly what I'm aiming for, good to see it holding in practice.
Tried it on a 40-page legal brief and the key points section actually picked up the arguments I needed to cite. Wish it had a side-by-side view with the original PDF, but the speed alone is worth the $5.
@ebruhbfq Appreciate the honest take. The side-by-side view keeps coming up (a couple others mentioned it too), so it's clearly worth prioritizing. Glad the speed made it worth it either way!