Launching today
AI Visibility
Check how ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude talk about your brand
12 followers
Check how ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude talk about your brand
12 followers
Your customers ask ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude before they ever reach Google. AI Visibility checks how those assistants talk about your brand: whether they name you, who they name instead, and which sources they trust. You get a visibility score, a competitor leaderboard, an AEO audit of your site, and a fix list you can act on the same day. Free to run on any brand and website.
We’ve been using AI Visibility for our SaaS, and it’s one of the few GEO/AI visibility tools that provides insights we can actually act on. We especially like seeing which prompts we’re already visible for, where competitors are ahead, and how our visibility changes over time. The reports have already inspired new content ideas, including comparison pages, integration guides, and content focused on real customer questions.
A couple of features we’d love to see: email notifications when a scheduled report is ready or when visibility changes significantly, plus a “content opportunities” section suggesting blog topics based on prompts where competitors are cited but we aren’t. A directory of potential guest post partners or industry blogs would also be a great addition.
Interesting direction. Have you noticed cases where an AI model confidently gives outdated or incorrect brand information, and if so, how do you distinguish hallucinations from missing public data?
the "assistants change their answers between runs" honesty is the right instinct, but it raises the obvious question: how many samples per assistant go into one score? a single ChatGPT call is basically one noisy draw, and if the tool only fires once per assistant per check, two people running it an hour apart on the same brand could get meaningfully different scores and think something changed when it's just sampling variance.
Love how it surfaces which sources the assistants actually trust rather than just giving a vague score, that level of detail makes the fix list feel actionable instead of generic.