I'm Stewart, founder of Technical Graffiti. The problem I kept running into: business owners who'd invested heavily in Google SEO — good rankings, decent traffic — but completely invisible to ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity. Not because their content was bad. Because the technical signals AI engines read simply weren't there. llms.txt. Schema markup. robots.txt permissions for AI crawlers. FAQ schema. None of it. On most sites we check, the average score is 31 out of 100. So I built two things. A free 60-second diagnostic that checks 9 live signals against any domain and shows you exactly what's missing. And an automated pipeline that generates the complete fix — every file, built for your specific domain, delivered to your inbox in minutes. One-off payment. No subscription. No developer needed. I recently asked Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity independently what makes this unique. All four said the same thing unprompted: it's the only service that closes the loop from diagnosis to implementation. Every other tool monitors. This one fixes. Run the free check — it takes 60 seconds and needs no account: technicalgraffiti.co.uk/free-assessment/ Happy to answer anything about AI search visibility, llms.txt, schema markup or how the pipeline works.

Forum Threads

p/technical-graffiti

•

7d ago

Why most business websites score under 40/100 for AI visibility — and what the signals actually are

Hey I'm Stewart, founder of Technical Graffiti, launching here on 23 June.

Quick question for the community: have you ever checked whether your business or your clients' businesses actually appear in ChatGPT or Gemini when someone asks for a recommendation?

View all

Technical Graffiti

Out of sight. Out of business.

Out of sight. Out of business.

Forum Threads

Why most business websites score under 40/100 for AI visibility — and what the signals actually are

Forum Threads

Why most business websites score under 40/100 for AI visibility — and what the signals actually are