Viktor.comAn AI coworker that actually does the work
IndexedAI
Your site scores X/100 for AI agents with next steps
69 followers
Your site scores X/100 for AI agents with next steps
69 followers
AI agents don't read sites like humans. They need structure, low noise, clear signals. IndexedAI gives you: → Agent Readiness Score (0–100) across 5 axes: discoverability, parsability, token efficiency, capability signaling, access control → Breakdown of what's dragging your score → Ready-to-deploy llms.txt + llms-full.txt 60 seconds. Free. Just URL + email. Most sites score below 50. Fixing it takes 10 minutes.
IndexedAI
This is the right question to be asking most site audits still ignore how AI agents crawl and index content. Does it check for things like llms.txt, structured data, and semantic clarity or mostly technical SEO signals?
IndexedAI
@imad_elkhafi Yes, all of those. llms.txt presence, JSON-LD/schema markup, robots.txt conflicts with AI crawlers, heading hierarchy for semantic clarity, and content chunking that survives RAG retrieval. Technical SEO signals are there too but they're a small part. The core question we answer is "will an AI agent actually cite your site", not just "can it technically reach it."
@guidodallerive "Will an AI agent actually cite your site" is the right reframe that's the metric that matters now. Running this on my site for sure.
IndexedAI
Built this after spending weeks manually checking if my sites were readable by AI agents. The score breakdown was the missing piece, not just "yes/no" but "here's exactly what to fix."
Curious: what's the first thing you'd check on your own site?