Launching today
IvaBot
Rank on Google. Get cited by AI. From $5 per audit.
13 followers
Rank on Google. Get cited by AI. From $5 per audit.
13 followers
IvaBot gives small business sites and solo founders three SEO tools: Core Audit, Content Coverage & AI Readiness, and Content Builder. Unlike generic AI writers that guess, IvaBot pulls real Google data through DataForSEO live SERP, parses your actual page, and uses 15 years of SEO experience built into the prompts.
@galyna_arikh I like the focus on small business sites here. Are users more interested in the technical SEO audit or in the get cited by Ai engines part?
@dmitrii_volosatov
Technical audit pulls in solo founders and devs who already know their site has issues but don't want to pay $99/mo for Ahrefs or other expensive tools.
AI citations pulls in content people and marketers seeing traffic shift to ChatGPT/Perplexity and not knowing how to adapt.
Technical audit gets more signups so far, but AI part gets more questions. My read: technical SEO = the familiar door, AI readiness = why they stay.
Are you seeing similar patterns in your space?
Congrats on the launch, Galyna 👏
Coming from an SEO background (before moving into campaigns/GTM), I'm curious whether IvaBot tracks LLM visibility somehow? At this stage, what we have is simulating prompts, but it's still really helpful to see (+ check the websites LLMs use as sources on the prompts relevant to your business). Is this something you've included or you're planning on shipping?
@denitsapenchevavaltchanova Thanks for the thoughtful question, and yes, you nailed exactly where the gap is.
Short answer: IvaBot does not track LLM visibility yet. AI Readiness checks the input side (whether your pages have the signals AI engines look for: extractable passages, schema, GPTBot access, comparison tables, etc.) but it doesn't tell you "you got cited 12 times this week."
The output side, actual citation tracking, is where I'm planning next. The hard part: there's no public API for "did ChatGPT cite this page." So the realistic approach is hybrid: prompt simulation across categories + monitoring referral traffic patterns in GA4 (Perplexity, ChatGPT.com, etc.) + Bing impressions as a leading indicator.
I actually wrote up the manual version of this method here, until I ship it as a feature: how to track AI citations in 15 minutes a week
Curious, when you were doing this on the SEO side, were you finding prompt simulation reliable enough, or did you need something more systematic?
@galyna_arikh honestly, I don't love prompt simulation but it's the best we have (until OpenAI, for example, actually gives us analytics). Automating the prompt simulations helps, though. At Progress, we don't do it manually, we use a tool that simulates a set of prompts (after being given context about the company and personas) across popular LLM chatbots and then use the insight from these simulations to inform strategy (e.g., try to appear where ChatGPT got its information from for our prompts). The downside is we still don't know if this is how actual humans use the LLM but... well, again, it's the best we have.
@denitsapenchevavaltchanova Yeah, that "we don't know if this is how actual humans use the LLM" piece is a gap.
Interesting that you use a tool that simulates a set of prompts to figure out where ChatGPT pulled the source from, then try to appear there. That's smar, treating it as a competitive intel signal rather than a vanity metric.
Tracking is on my roadmap, but I want to build it differently from enterprise tools. For a solo founder with 5 hours a week, even a smart tool with hundreds of personas is too much. Looking at something lighter, maybe a small set of hand-picked prompts they care about + referral traffic patterns.
Long way to go though.
Hey Product Hunt 👋
Different AI engines cite different sources for the same query - ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI rarely agree. Most SEO tools optimize for Google rankings only. IvaBot audits your page for what AI engines look at when picking what to cite.
IvaBot is an SEO tool for small business websites, solo founders, and content creators who want SEO insights without agency pricing.
What makes it different: $5 per audit, pay-as-you-go, no subscription. Most SEO tools charge $50-300/month. For irregular usage like most small biz owners, that math doesn't work.
Three modules:
Core Audit — technical SEO, content structure, internal links, titles and meta, backlink advice (~2 min)
Content Coverage & AI Readiness — keyword gaps + 14 AI citation signals like extractable passages, schema, comparison tables (~3 min)
Content Builder — article generation with real search data (~5 min)
Free tier: 1 run of each. No card required.
I'm Galyna, solo founder. Built this over 9 months while learning to code from scratch. Most SEO tools are over-engineered for agencies; this one is built for people who run one audit when they need it, not on a calendar.
What's coming next (based on real feedback):
Change detection — alerts when your score drops or competitors gain citations you don't have
Expanded AI citation readiness checks — see exactly how your page compares to pages AI engines cite
Would love honest feedback today. What's missing, what's confusing, what you'd actually pay for. I'm here all day reading comments.
Try free: ivabot.xyz/app