Hi PH — I'm Nick, I built RedPen. Between four years at Elsevier building AI editorial tools and running Nuance — a Web3 blogging platform with 7,000 users and 16,000 articles — I spent a long time close to both editors and writers, across academic and open publishing. The consistent problem, from every angle: writers had no way to know if their work was actually landing. Not a grammar problem. A structure, argument, clarity problem. And no tool addressed it. RedPen is what those writers needed: blunt editorial feedback on structure, argument, clarity, and tone — with specific rewrites, not vague suggestions. It's calibrated to format, so feedback on a newsletter is different from feedback on a sales page. It's not trying to write for you. It's trying to make what you wrote better. 2 free analyses to try it. I'd genuinely love to know whether the feedback lands the way a real editor's would — that's the hardest thing to get right and I'm still tuning it.

RedPen

Real editorial feedback. Not grammar fixes.

Real editorial feedback. Not grammar fixes.