OpenBox.ai is live with 7+ agent framework integrations

byโ€ข

is live on Product Hunt today with major product updates!

Weโ€™ve expanded OpenBox from a runtime governance layer into a framework-agnostic control layer that teams can use across their existing AI agent stack.

๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜โ€™๐˜€ ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜„:

๐Ÿ”Œ 8+ integrations with Temporal, LangChain, LangGraph, CrewAI, Mastra, Deep Agents, CopilotKit, and n8n

โœ… Policy enforcement before agent actions execute

๐Ÿ™‹ Human approval workflows for sensitive actions

๐Ÿ” Real-time monitoring of agent behaviour and risk

โช Complete session replay to understand what happened

๐Ÿ“‹ Tamper-proof audit trails and Proof Certificates

๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ Mapping of agent activity to frameworks such as the EU AI Act and NIST

The goal is to give teams one consistent way to control and audit their agents, regardless of the framework or system they use.

If youโ€™re building AI agents, weโ€™d love your feedback on the updated OpenBox experience and the integrations we should add next.

๐—–๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ธ ๐˜‚๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐˜‚๐—ฐ๐˜ ๐—›๐˜‚๐—ป๐˜:

18 views

Add a comment

Replies

Best

Upvoted you!! Congrats on the launch! ๐ŸŽ‰

I like that you're taking a framework-agnostic approach. A lot of teams are using multiple agent frameworks now, so having one place for governance and monitoring makes much more sense than managing each one separately.

Real time monitoring is useful but large agent systems can generate huge amounts of activity. How do you surface the highest risk events without overwhelming teams with constant notifications?

Have you found a good balance between safety and avoiding unnecessary interruptions for developers?

I like that policy enforcement happens before actions execute instead of after something goes wrong. How flexible are those policies when different teams have very different risk tolerance and compliance requirements?