We launched Intrascope 2.0 today: one AI workspace for your team, with company-level control
Hi Hunters,
Vladimir here, co-founder of Intrascope. Today is our third launch on Product Hunt, and 2.0 is the biggest update we have shipped so far.
The problem we keep hearing from companies: every team uses a different AI tool, nobody knows what it costs, and company context gets pasted into chats again and again.
Intrascope gives the whole team one workspace with 120+ models (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Mistral, xAI and more), while admins keep control over access, budgets and usage.
What is new in 2.0:
- Skills: 50 built-in playbooks plus your own, shared privately, per project, per team or company-wide, and triggered with /
- Connections: 1,650+ apps (Gmail, Slack, Notion, GitHub...) that admins can block per company and users connect with their own accounts
- Company and project manifests, so answers follow your rules without repeating them
- Limits and spend tracking per user, team and workspace
- A complete redesign of Platform and Chat
I would love your honest feedback, especially on two things:
1. Which Skills would you want built in?
2. How does your team handle AI spend today?
Here is the launch page: https://www.producthunt.com/products/intrascope-app?launch=intrascope-2-0
Thanks for checking it out!
Replies
A support-to-bug-report Skill could pull out what happened, expected behavior and reproduction steps, then flag missing details as questions. I'd want each observation linked back to its source message so a tidy report doesn't hide uncertainty.
@al_kub That’s a great use case. Linking each observation to the original message would let an engineer check the context without digging through the whole conversation. I’d also keep confirmed details separate from open questions, so a missing reproduction step becomes a follow-up question instead of an AI guess. Thanks for suggesting this!