What evidence would make company website intelligence trustworthy?

I’m building FirmSignalIQ around a simple problem: a company domain is often the only input you have, but most enrichment tools return conclusions without enough evidence to judge them.

The API turns a public company website into sourced metadata, technology signals, and observed changes. Before launch, I’m working through how much evidence to surface without making every response noisy.

If you were using this for lead research, vendor monitoring, or competitive intelligence, which result would need to be instantly trustworthy? And would you rather receive a concise summary first or the supporting evidence first? The public preview is at and runnable examples are at .

1 view

Add a comment

Replies

Be the first to comment