EmberCine - AI film studio + streaming platform for quality AI films

by
EmberCine is both a studio and a streaming platform for AI-made films. Creators chat with a Director AI to turn an idea into characters, shots, a timeline and a finished film with trailer. Only quality AI-generated films make the catalogue: every film is reviewed before it goes live. Viewers stream a curated library; creators earn a share of subscription revenue by watch-time. We're pre-launch. Join the waitlist as a creator or a viewer and help us get the first films made.

Add a comment

Replies

Best
Hunter
📌
Hi Product Hunt! I'm Dana, solo founder of EmberCine. I built EmberCine because AI film had nowhere to live. Tools like Runway or Kling hand you an MP4 and stop. YouTube's 2025 "inauthentic content" policy limits monetization of AI content at scale. Netflix stays human-first. OpenAI's Sora feed shut down this spring. So creators who make good AI films have no audience and no income from them, and viewers have no curated place to watch. EmberCine is that place: - Studio: chat with a Director AI, and it walks you from a logline to characters, locations, shots, a timeline, a finished film and a trailer. Multi-model under the hood (Veo, Kling, Seedance). - Review: every film is checked before it goes live. No slop, no feed. - Cinema + TrailTok: a subscription catalogue of full films, plus a vertical trailer feed anyone can browse. - Earnings: creators share 55% of net subscription revenue by watch-time, plus tips. Withdraw or reinvest into the next film. Where we are: the platform is live and working end to end, but we're pre-launch. Like every marketplace we start empty on both sides, so right now we're gathering a waitlist of founding creators (featured placement, credits and a bounty for films that pass review) and first viewers. If you make AI films, or you'd watch them, join the waitlist at embercine.com. I'd love feedback on the review model and the earnings split. I'll be here all day.

What criteria are used for the check before a film is approved for the public catalogue?

 
Every film gets watched by a person (right now that's me) before it goes into the catalogue. I'm looking at a few things:

Story — is there an actual plot that holds your attention for the whole film, or is it a loop of pretty shots? We'll always favour films with a strong, interesting story.

Quality — we promise viewers watchable films, so if voices don't match the characters, lip sync is off, or the visuals glitch, it doesn't go through.

Content — no glorification of violence, nothing that wouldn't pass normal content rules, and it has to be the creator's own story, not a copy of an existing film.

If a film doesn't pass, I send a short note on what to fix and it can be resubmitted. The goal is to help people get through, not to gatekeep. I'll publish the full checklist once it settles a bit.