AI Context | Smart, Safe, Scalable - Building the layer for responsible AI documentation
by•
Using AI already carries obligations. We give you the starting point: indicative role, risk level and exportable documentation in minutes.
EU Regulation 2024/1689 requires companies and professionals to document, assess and manage their AI use. 90% of SMEs don't know if it applies to them, what role they play as Deployer or Provider.
AICONTEXT can generate in minutes an indicative self-assessment draft with regulatory role, risk level and measures to consider.
Replies
Hi, I'm Ricky, founder of AICONTEXT (Barcelona).
Most companies already use AI every day: contracts pasted into ChatGPT, marketing copy, CV screening, invoices, presentations. Much of it is "shadow AI" that nobody has mapped.
The EU AI Act was updated in July 2026. It doesn't ask you for a specific certificate or course. It asks you to take reasonable steps around how your team uses AI, and in practice, that means being able to show what you did.
That's what AICONTEXT is for:
Self-assessment: find out which AI tools your company uses, who uses them and for what, with an indicative role and risk level.
Documentation: turn that into an organised brief covering 13 areas of the AI Act.
Traceability: once a brief is closed it's sealed with a timestamp and a SHA-256 fingerprint of its content. It can't be edited or deleted afterwards, not even from the database, and the exported PDF carries the seal so anyone can check the content hasn't changed.
We don't sell legal compliance. If you need a lawyer or technical specialist, our marketplace connects you with independent professionals registered in 7 countries, with no commissions.
100% EU-hosted data. Start with the free self-assessment, no credit card required: aicontext.eu
I'd love your feedback, especially from anyone managing AI use in a small team.
Nice that you tackle the EU AI Act paperwork gap for SMEs. One feature that would really help: a simple side-by-side comparison view showing the indicative role and risk level next to a checklist of practical compliance measures, so users can see at a glance what steps remain before they finalize their documentation.
@ned_kettering Thanks. We actually already have this implemented by default
In the brief editor you get the indicative role + risk level right at the top, with a checklist sidebar showing exactly which sections/compliance items are done vs. still pending (with a completion %). Take a look and let me know if it matches what you had in mind, or if you meant something more granular (e.g. checklist items tied to specific legal obligations rather than brief sections). I will be happy to share a PRO license for you to check and try.
Among other features as data evidence, log process:
And guidence:
Ran it on a couple of projects and the indicative deployer role plus risk level came back surprisingly fast and matched what I would have written manually. Documentation export is a real time saver.
@mercer_yan Thanks Janessa! Great to hear the classification matched your manual read, that's the bar we hold it to internally too. Glad the export is saving you time.
love how the output stays structured around the three things regulators actually want to see, role, risk, and measures, instead of dumping a generic compliance wall of text
@berkrat9 Thanks Berk! That's the whole idea....Smart. Safe. Scalable it is the layer we are buidling for an innovative EU AI. We focus on role, risk, and measures so that's what stays front and center instead of a generic compliance wall of text driving to confusion and SME's not being ready for a real inspection. Rgds