Would you still hire people for your project after ChatGPT?

If you have played around with chatGPT for a while, you will find out that it is not that good. Well, it is, but not human-level. Yes it may be faster and more efficient, but the code it produces still needs debugging. Consider it an extra fast junior dev. Now, when it comes to writing text, it is only good for a replacement of the lorem ispum we use to fill space. And google now tracks AI- generated content and marks it as spam which hurts SEO. So the future of AI, at least for now, is to help professionals.

I mean , you have the tool , but does it mean your have the knowledge? I remember a good example someone gave it here: You can give a person a F1 , but they won't be as good and fast as a F1 driver.

Absolutely. ChatGPT still has a long way to go to start with individual thinking. It requires a fair amount of setup when integrating with Make or Zapier before I can use the data it's giving me (especially when the volume of queries being run is large). Additionally, the content usually is not humane and super consumable. I find that having a person add insights, use cases, and making the content more relatable leads to a better reader experience at large.

Yes, I would still hire people so we can produce high-quality content in scale!

ChatGPT is a huge time saver for business but it still can't replace human touch. I would still hire people :)

Great questions @ankitsharmaofficial It seems I need to hire additional people to technically integrate and manage the GPT functions within our SaaS Platform Conversa. I also need the extra people to moderate the self generated content, and provide new tools for our users. As far as I can see no one on the tech side of the industry is losing their jobs over this! I want to make our platform better for our clients. I now need more people to help integrate GPT!

Definitely will still keep hiring but the jobs and skills will change. Chatgpt is really good at being different sources together and highlighting what is important but ultimately still lacks creative direction. I think a great example is how it will change how we code. gPT can parse complex user manuals and API specs and write surprisingly good demo code. It can even correct mistakes but needs a human in the loop to guide the results. I think this will make it easier to build quick prototypes, but that is a long way from a fully tested customer facing product. I believe it will help automate tasks for non-programmers but ultimately my staff will need solid debugging skills and follow test-driven development and still stay up to date on the latest tech. GTP's knowledge training database ends in 2021.