Why do people think that mass unfollowing after 2 days of mutual following is a good tactic?

I have the same question too. I don't think it's a good strategy. 😪

They probably wanna seem cooler I guess 😅😅

No idea :D "follow for follow" is doubtful in my opinion anyway haha

I've seen that tactic usually on Instagram and other social media with the main audience being young adults. Since influencers and celebrity accounts have a lot of followers and little people who they follow back, I believe they want to be just like them and act look 'cooler', hence the strategy.

Bro i always wondered, why people like to have many followers but following few... is this selfishness or how do we call it...!?

People be transactional - is what it is. Most people don't get on these platforms because they genuinely want to find connections and mingle. They're after the dough, and community-building is just a stepping stone to get there, I guess. Works the same in relationships and friendships. Everyone wants to be the popular kid, not everyone wants to be the universal fan.

The practice of mass unfollowing after a short period of mutual following on social media is often associated with certain strategies and goals, but it's important to note that this tactic can be seen as disingenuous or insincere by some users. Here are some reasons why people might engage in this behavior, and some of the criticisms associated with it: 1. Gaining Followers: Some individuals use mass following as a strategy to quickly gain followers. By following a large number of users, they hope that a percentage of those users will follow them back. After a few days, they then unfollow those who did not reciprocate to maintain a more favorable follower-to-following ratio. Criticisms: This tactic can be seen as manipulative and insincere because it may involve following users solely to gain followers, rather than because of a genuine interest in their content. It can also clutter the feeds of users who follow back and may lead to a lack of meaningful engagement. 2. Cleaning Up the Feed: Some users follow a large number of accounts initially to see if the content aligns with their interests. After a short period, they unfollow accounts that do not produce content they find valuable. Criticisms: While this approach may seem more genuine in terms of interest in content, doing it in a short timeframe can be perceived as inauthentic, as it doesn't allow time to genuinely engage with or appreciate the content of those you follow. 3. Managing a Favorable Follower-to-Following Ratio: Some users believe that maintaining a high follower count while following a minimal number of accounts makes their profile appear more influential. They unfollow others to maintain this ratio. Criticisms: Focusing solely on the appearance of influence can lead to a lack of authenticity and meaningful connections on social media. It may also alienate users who value genuine engagement over follower counts. In general, the mass unfollowing tactic is often criticized because it can come across as inauthentic, manipulative, and driven primarily by self-interest rather than genuine interest in content or meaningful connections. Social media platforms are designed for building connections and engaging with content, and tactics that exploit these systems for personal gain are typically discouraged by both platforms and users. Many platforms have policies and algorithms in place to detect and limit such behavior. Building a genuine and engaged following is usually a more sustainable and authentic approach to social media presence.

Whats this tactic.. first time I heard of it 😲

"follow for follow" is doubtful in my opinion