Hey PH! I just launched @VouchVendor, an AI-powered vendor risk platform that replaces the spreadsheet grind of SOC reviews (for any of you risk and compliance folks out there). Upload a vendor's SOC report and get automated control extraction, framework mapping (SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST CSF, SOX), and a risk score in minutes. Built for security and compliance teams who are drowning in vendor assessments.

It's free to try. Would love your feedback as we keep building.

We re teaming up with The Pitch by @Deel, a global startup competition where up to 100 winners will receive $50k in funding and up to 10 winners will receive $1M+.

If you make the cut, you ll also show up on special Product Hunt leaderboards, starting with the first event on April 13.

I've spent numerous years in IT audit and kept running into the same wall: security and compliance teams were burning 4+ hours manually reading SOC 2 PDFs for every vendor review, cross-referencing controls, building spreadsheets, chasing exceptions. It's repetitive, error-prone, and completely automatable. So I built VouchVendor, where you simply upload a SOC 2 report and get AI-extracted controls, framework mappings (SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST, SOX), and a risk score in under 2 minutes. I'm launching today and would love feedback from anyone who's dealt with third-party risk or compliance workflows. Happy to connect!

I built VouchVendor because I lived that pain. The average third-party risk review takes 4+ hours per vendor. Multiply that by 20, 50, 100 vendors and you have a full-time job that adds zero strategic value.

My goal is simple: make vendor assurance invisible. Upload a report, get a structured risk score, mapped controls, and a questionnaire, in under 2 minutes.

Hi everyone

I m Ankit, currently building in the CRM space.

Over the past few months, I kept running into the same problem -
leads would come from everywhere (emails, chats, meetings), but managing them was always messy.

Spreadsheets felt manual.
Tools felt heavy.
And somehow, the pipeline never really reflected what was actually happening.

Every day, after launching, makers are contacted on LinkedIn and X by people offering to sell votes. As the Product Hunt team, we are very much aware of this and really hate it. We have systems in place to neutralize this type of gaming. Every vote counts for a different number of points on Product Hunt. A couple examples:

• An account with a recently created gmail address and no history of quality contributions on Product Hunt: this vote will count for 0 points. Yes, this might be a well intentioned user, but we take a conservative approach to protect the community. If the account has a company email or applies for verification on Product Hunt, that's a different story.

• An account with a company email address linked to a legitimate LinkedIn account with a history of meaningful contributions on Product Hunt: this vote carries significant weight.

A couple questions for the community:

• Are there specific accounts on Product Hunt that you suspect participate in vote selling? You can reply here or email report@producthunt.co

• What would you want to see us do differently here?

Hey I'm James, a software developer from Australia with 20+ years building things professionally.

Most of my career I've been the person behind the scenes solving hard technical problems, shipping reliable software, making other people's ideas work. Unravl is the first thing I've built entirely for myself, and now I'm figuring out the part they don't teach developers: how to actually get it in front of people who might find it useful.

No funding. No growth team. No playbook. Just me, the product, and a lot of learning in public.

If you've been down this road builder trying to find an audience I'd genuinely love to hear what worked for you. And if Unravl sounds like something you'd use, even better.