Vu_Tram

I was rereading parts of The Mom Test, and it reminded me how easy it is to mistake politeness for validation.

Someone says the idea sounds useful, they like the direction, they would definitely try it, and maybe they even suggest a few features. It feels like progress, but sometimes they are just being nice.

The dangerous part is that polite feedback does not feel negative. It gives you just enough confidence to keep building without proving whether the problem is actually painful.

I think the harder skill is learning to ignore compliments and look for behavior instead.

I spent nearly four years on one idea before I finally pivoted to what I'm building now (@Basedash: AI data analyst). What mostly bothers me isn't that I was wrong, it's that I still can't tell you the exact signal that should've made me quit two years earlier.

At the time everything felt like progress. We had users, we had encouraging conversations, we had the occasional good week that convinced me the next one would be better. None of it was a clear "stop."

This feels like a hard balance, especially for products that need a bit of context.

If the landing page explains too much, it can start to feel heavy. If it explains too little, people may sign up without really understanding the problem, the use case, or why the product matters.

I ve seen products where the tool itself is good, but the first reaction is still: I don t get it yet.

For makers here, what do you try to make clear before signup, and what do you leave for users to discover inside the product?