We re super excited to announce that Foodiv.com is launching on Product Hunt in just a few hours! What is Foodiv.com? It s a commission-free online ordering system that empowers restaurants to launch their own website, mobile app, and QR-based ordering system all in one place! No hefty commissions, no middlemen just a seamless way for restaurants to take control of their online orders. Why We Built This? Many restaurants struggle with high commission fees from third-party apps, making it hard to stay profitable. We wanted to create a simple, affordable, and powerful solution that lets restaurants own their branding, customers, and revenue without paying a cut to middlemen. If you're passionate about the food industry, startups, or just love seeing innovative solutions, we d appreciate you checking out our launch. Drop a comment below if you re excited, and we ll notify you the moment we go live! Let s make this big!

There was a lot of talk in 2023 and 2024 about startups using a one-time payment model, but earlier this year, I started to see founders going back to subscriptions. What do you think?

Introduction: Thanks to state-of-the-art AI models, coding has transformed into a conversational process. By simply defining your project's constraints, a back-and-forth dialogue with the AI can take you from idea to product in just one day without AI, this could take one to two weeks of trial and error. Planing: Before starting the project, I sought to identify the problem I wanted to solve. With the Babel project (github*com/eonist/babel), I aimed to use AI to translate localization strings for iPhone apps. I needed to localize my app soon, and the only alternative was to pay $150+ to services like Localise*com. How hard could it be? Famous last words (But not this time. ) Identifying the Problem: - High Cost: Existing solutions like Localise*com are priced at $150+ per month. - Dependency on Third Parties: Relying on external providers can be risky they may increase prices, shut down, or change their services unexpectedly. - Lack of Free Online Hosting: Other solutions exist, but they don't offer free cloud-based translation hosting. - Quality Concerns: Language translation is complex, and human translators still outperform even the best AI models. Identifying the Solution: - OpenAI's GPT-4 is affordable, costing as little as $0.01 to $1.00 for multiple language translations. - We can trigger OpenAI to update translations whenever needed by creating an automated workflow with GitHub Actions. - Hosting the project in a GitHub repository allows users to fork it and integrate it into their own app projects using their own OpenAI API key. - The latest OpenAI models offer near-human translation quality, verified in various translation benchmarks. Defining the Agentic Flow: To build the agentic flow, I first researched the necessary components using PPLx.ai here are the steps I needed to accomplish my AI wrapper app: 1. Read the English version into a list. 2. Send this list to OpenAI and request translations into the required languages. 3. Store the returned data in language files. 4. Perform basic testing with a unit test to ensure the translations have the correct format. 5. As a bonus, notify a Slack channel when the translations are finished, including a receipt from OpenAI detailing the cost of the batch job. The Coding Part - I asked PPLX*ai with the prompt: "In GitHub Actions, how do I perform steps 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 one after the other?" - Then I stored the returned answers as issues in my Babel project. - Next, I started to copy and paste the code into Cursor. - Once all five parts were copied over, I began asking Cursor to improve the code. I didn't even upload to GitHub; I wanted to get my bearings first and understand how everything worked. - I'm not a native Python coder, nor am I familiar with GitHub Action YAML format or JavaScript. However, I knew how to articulate what I wanted to achieve in the five steps for my agentic AI flow. - I then started to ask Cursor and O1 to comment on each part of the code and kept asking the AI if there was anything I could add or improve upon. - The comments helped the AI understand my intent. - If I didn't understand something, I went back to PPLX*ai and asked about concepts I didn't fully grasp. After a few hours, I had the five steps coded up in five different GitHub Action workflows. - Then I took a long break before uploading the project with GitHub Desktop and began debugging errors. - GitHub Actions immediately reported errors in the code, starting from the first step. - So I copied the error and pasted it into Cursor and O1, asking them to solve the issue. - O1 would then provide new code that I copied over and uploaded to GitHub. - This process continued for a few hours, clearing one step after another, and soon enough, all five steps were complete. Shipping: With the code working as intended you upload English text and receive translations in multiple languages it was time to wrap up the project. I created a README.md document outlining how it could be used. The final step was to announce the project to the world by making a social media post on LinkedIn. The launch of my first AI wrapper went exceptionally well. I posted it late on a Sunday, and by Wednesday, more than 14,000 people had viewed the LinkedIn post. During this project, using O1 cost me approximately $50 $100 for 10 12 hours of non-stop coding. However, with DeepSeek R1, which rivals O1, the cost should now be reduced to $5 $10. Utilizing deluxe models is essential for this kind of high-level coding.