Lyondhür Picciarelli

Can't edit nor remove task comments. Unusable in a professional setting.

Turns the news into something even more cumbersome and hard to read, since it's an AI editorial layer on top of already convoluted headlines and content. Something like asking a bot to "make what read plain, oversimplified and unreliable". At times it changes even the context of a piece of news. But he would love it to work as depicted; unfortunately this isn't the case at all.

"I'll be back next Thursday, darling.."

Pretty. Lovely. Consistent. Also, trapping, unsustainable, lacking and über-slow to evolve. I've had a love-hate relationship with Things since their very first version, up until their last release. I got tired of waiting and compromising with other apps to do what I need. Leaving Things3 was a real nightmare, as I had so much in there. CC chases highlights in the AppStore to exist, and has little to no interest in user feedback. A very expensive one-thing only tool, at times where everyone in the room is smarter. If only others could copy it's perfect parsing add task extension.. I am far and well away from it.

I'm a Lifetime Supporter of Agenda. Unique, beautifully crafted and with a truly dedicated look into solving real users issues. Instead of repeating what everyone else does, Agenda feels and works for me in a unique manner. Alex and Drew truly love this project and it shows in the final result. Nothing but love for Agenda and their ambitions. Plus: they 100% solved software pricing. Their model is second to none.

Hard to find anything else that compares to Sorted3. There may be marginally prettier elsewhere, but for beautiful AND the most functional, look no further. Plus, it's built right: no subscriptions.

I appreciate founders Alfred and David for promptly answering questions and engaging with us users. I myself cannot possibly think of a scenario where I would allow non-verified strangers to call me unannounced — I would not even consider it as a possibility. The potential at-scale risk for spam and abuse from fake accounts, no real human verification and no moderation is just unviable as a concept for me.

I am recanting my first reaction to Spark 3. Users are often quite emotionally attached to their ways and features, and often times the first reaction isn't always the most well-considered response. Although it seems that Spark may have overly inspired itself in the workflows offered by Basecamp's HEY app, upon studying it a bit more, it is a welcoming progression from V2. I guess the main issue was they way that the subscription model was introduced into a drastically different experience that did not include previously owned features. That's what sparked (no pun intended) the reactive fire from most users. I cannot say I dislike the direction the team is going with an Electron-based app and its offer for focus, shortcutting and processing velocity. These are all great ambitions to be aspired (although that bundled notifications line away from the top of the screen is a UX heinous crime). We as users may sometimes forget to praise changes, more so from where they are trying to get to instead of the first steps towards that are often meddled by obstacles. Definitely not a perfect release. Promising though. More importantly, it still comes from a group of people who listen and legitimately care about solving users issues. We should all get behind and encourage that; specially counting how much of the features can be used for free. Keep at it. Fix these smaller hiccups. You're great, and I am still applauding.