Talk it out. Speech to Note write it down. ✍️🎙️
A random idea, a blog post, or your next big presentation — just speak and we’ll turn it into clean, structured notes.
No typing. No distractions. Just talk — and get notes you can actually use.
Taking notes isn t the problem. Finding them when you actually need them? That s where things fall apart.
For too long, users have relied on search bars, filters, and endless scrolling to retrieve important notes. And when you re managing meeting transcripts, investor calls, brainstorming sessions, and research notes, that system breaks fast.
That s why we built Folders in Speech to Note (STN) so your notes don t just exist, they actually work for you.
We're building a personalized language-learning app inspired by our own experiences and frustrations with the one-size-fits-all approach of traditional apps. Our goal is to offer customized and adaptive learning paths, powered by user data and tailored to individual interests, goals, and motivations.
I won t go into full pitch mode just yet, but we d love to start a discussion around this question:
What s your biggest pain point or frustration with current language-learning apps?
Denmark just entered the AI big leagues with Gefion, a sovereign AI supercomputer, powered by 1,528 NVIDIA H100 GPUs, and already ranked #21 on the TOP500 list of the world s most powerful machines.
But this isn t just about computing power. It s about control.
For decades, AI innovation has been concentrated in a handful of markets, dictated by a few players. Gefion changes that. This isn t just a machine it s a declaration that AI leadership isn t reserved for tech giants or a select few nations.
Jensen Huang called it a "factory of intelligence," and that s exactly what it is. A nation s ability to compute at scale will define its standing in the global AI race. It will decide who leads in healthcare, energy, finance, and defense. It will determine who innovates, who follows, and who gets left behind.
I support structured, high-value discussions nobody wants forums filled with spam and self-promotion. But here s the issue: understanding what qualifies as valuable.
Product Hunt s updated guidelines push for original, engaging, and non-replicable content. Makes sense. But when posts disappear without clear reasoning, it creates confusion.
Where s the line between sharing insights and self-promotion?
What defines a post as high-value in this new system?
Why not offer feedback instead of outright removals?
Stronger moderation is great if paired with transparency. Instead of guessing what works, clearer guidelines and examples could help everyone create better discussions.
I support structured, high-value discussions nobody wants forums filled with spam and self-promotion. But here s the issue: understanding what qualifies as valuable.
Product Hunt s updated guidelines push for original, engaging, and non-replicable content. Makes sense. But when posts disappear without clear reasoning, it creates confusion.
Where s the line between sharing insights and self-promotion?
What defines a post as high-value in this new system?
Why not offer feedback instead of outright removals?
Stronger moderation is great if paired with transparency. Instead of guessing what works, clearer guidelines and examples could help everyone create better discussions.
I find it much more convenient now to have separate sections for the title and body. It used to be confusing, I'd type everything in the title and then have to sort it out later. Now, with options to bold, quote, and format text, it's a breeze to share raw thoughts and organize them clearly. This way if a topic isn't enticing, people can easily skip it or skim through. I'm unsure how they pulled it off, but it's brilliant!