WebShelf

WebShelf

browser plugin, offline web browser, offline work

0 followers

Visit website
WebShelf is an extension for the most popular web browsers - Google Chrome, Apple Safari and, possibly, Mozilla Firefox - which would allow the user to keep all of the website - not the only and separate webpage - but the whole website - for offline browsing.
WebShelf gallery image
Launch tags:Chrome Extensions
Launch Team

What do you think? …

Denis Polyanskiy
Maker
Hi guys and girls! Let me ask you if it worth making an extension for the most popular web browsers - Google Chrome, Apple Safari and, possibly, Mozilla Firefox - which would allow the user to keep all of the website - not the only and separate webpage - but the whole website - for offline browsing? It will work as the only button - “Download the website” at the first time - and with a content update option available for saved websites too. And, of course, the UX and UI of this browser extension will be clean, simple and fast ;) So, what do you think about this idea - if this worth to be realized?! Thank you in advance, Denis Polyanskiy
Peter Thaleikis
@denis_polyanskiy1 it would crawl the whole site and make it offline accessible?
Denis Polyanskiy
Maker
@spekulatius1984 Thanks, Peter! Exactly! You need only to click on "Download the website" button - and it will be saved on your local machine and available offline.
Peter Thaleikis
@denis_polyanskiy1 Cool, is there an option to maybe export the whole site (e.g. as a zip)? That would make it awesome to archive websites
Denis Polyanskiy
Maker
@spekulatius1984 Thanks Peter! Exactly so - we're planning to make the option "Save the website in a web broser's cache" as the basic feature by default (and free for all of the users) and let our advanced users to save the website in a selected folder on a local storage space and also to export the website as an archive (.ZIP or .TAR).
Peter Thaleikis
@denis_polyanskiy1 interesting! is there already a beta/first version or is it only an idea?
Denis Polyanskiy
Maker
@spekulatius1984 Yes, of course! Thanks Peter! ;)