
Reviews Embed
Select reviews to create a gallery that you can easily embed on your product website.
73 Reviews
Most recent
Any Rating
It is still early days for me, but so far, Warp has definitely improved my productivity on the terminal. The terminal is such a critical part of my toolbox that whoever makes something that is meant to improve my experience needs to nail it, and so far, Warp has nailed it. Good job folks!
It started out great, but the forced login and survey does it for me. Sure, I will login if it improves my experience on your app, and especially if I already like it -- but I hate being forced to go through it when I'm trying to get something done. It doesn't end there either, we have a long mandatory survey with mandatory questions, and a tiny hidden skip button for some of the questions. Why put the skip button there at all if you're so desperate to have people answer your survey?
For fairness to Warp, the configuration for the app was reset after I had to reset my macOS password, and the keychains were removed / not synched yet. It is a one time step when you first install the app, but I continue to dislike being made to go through that long process for a terminal.
Warp is an absolutely awesome product! I've been using it for a few months and a totally in love. It's amazing that such a critical tool for many developers has never had its UX reimagined until now. There are a lot of pretty and usable terminals out there, but I think Warp is both visually appealing and has already solved some of the most simple pain points in terminal use (simple copy / paste, cursor navigation) that I don't see myself using anything other terminal app for awhile.
Thanks to the Warp team for putting out such a high-quality dev tool!
Warp is a good terminal. It is fast and reliable.
It works well with multiple tabs and makes tab switching easy. It also has a ton of preset commands and allows you to create your own presets workflows.
However its auto complete is not great. One thing that I miss in particular is auto-complete for git commands.
For example, when pushing to a remote repository for the first time, you usually use: "git push -u origin ", unfortunately when I type "git push -u origin " with the name of the current branch. It instead uses the name of another one, and only presents the correct suggestion after pressing tab.
This can be confusing at times, since you might set the wrong remote branch by mistake.
Handling git was something that their competitor, Fig, did very well. Personally, I would like to have a similar experience on Warp.
Also, the hotkeys are sometimes unintuitive, for example, when you get an auto-complete suggestion, you have to press the right arrow to accept it, because pressing tab will open the auto-complete menu.