Vantage: Psychometric Testing Platform

👋 I'm Sarthak, and I built Vantage.

Career counselling still runs on a stack of separate test PDFs. Students can't make sense of them, and counsellors spend hours turning them into something useful. Vantage puts the whole process in one place:

Assign: pick one assessment or a full package, for one student or a whole batch at once.
Assess: students answer on any device, at their own pace.
Score: each test is scored by its own published method and written up in plain language. The report opens with short story cards a student actually reads.
Review: you read it, add notes and decide when to release it. Nothing reaches a student without a counsellor's sign-off. That's a design choice, not a setting.

Four established, published instruments are live today: IPIP-NEO-120 personality, the ONET Interest Profiler (RIASEC), SSEIT emotional intelligence, and the ONET Work Importance Locator. They're compiled into one career profile.

Try it without signing up: the login page has one-click demo accounts for both the counsellor and the student view. They're read-only, so explore freely. Creating your own account is free and needs no card. Pricing is per student, not per seat.

What I'd love feedback on:

Counsellors: does the review-before-release flow match how you actually work? What would make you trust the reports enough to use them with families?
The report itself: open the demo student's report. Is anything confusing, too long, or missing for a 15–18-year-old (or their parents)?
Pricing: does per-student pricing make sense for your practice, or would you expect something else?
Anything that broke, felt slow, or made you hesitate. Blunt is welcome.

I'll be here all day replying to every comment. Thank you for taking a look! 🙏

👋 I'm Sarthak, and I built Vantage.

Assign: pick one assessment or a full package, for one student or a whole batch at once.
Assess: students answer on any device, at their own pace.
Score: each test is scored by its own published method and written up in plain language. The report opens with short story cards a student actually reads.
Review: you read it, add notes and decide when to release it. Nothing reaches a student without a counsellor's sign-off. That's a design choice, not a setting.

What I'd love feedback on:

Counsellors: does the review-before-release flow match how you actually work? What would make you trust the reports enough to use them with families?
The report itself: open the demo student's report. Is anything confusing, too long, or missing for a 15–18-year-old (or their parents)?
Pricing: does per-student pricing make sense for your practice, or would you expect something else?
Anything that broke, felt slow, or made you hesitate. Blunt is welcome.

I'll be here all day replying to every comment. Thank you for taking a look! 🙏