63$ for the premium plan? That's a very odd (read unusual) price point.
So why should I use this instead of using an npm module and running it through a task runner?
Report
Love the idea and if you are managing site dev at an agency, lots of volume, it could be great.
I see this more and more on PH, people wanting recurring revenue streams (which I get) but price them at what they think they are worth based on the effort they put in to develop the tool, rather than what the market will pay. Just my two cents. $5-8/month for a single site (paid yearly) would have got me to sign up right away without a second glance. What you want is yearly subs that auto-renew, at a price point that people will be ok letting renew.
Putting this against other things I pay for currently, (Adobe Creative Suite, Sketch etc) the pricing seems pretty high. Value vs Cost. Just curious, how did you arrive at the pricing? Something you thought was reasonable or did you talk to various potential customers?
Report
Not sure if I understand how it works. Can I clean up my css only by scanning the URL?
Nowadays it's pretty common and easy to setup automatic deployments and static websites are getting distinct. Especially in the market to whom you are trying to sell to. You should provide API and build subscription around this. So I can use the service when I compile during deployment or better if it's a NPM package so I can integrate (would make it faster too).
Report
I thought this was a good idea, then I used it. Literally doesn't work - their site didn't load it's own CSS file. Finally used a different browser. You have to log in and sign up to even see the results they email to you. But it's a limited preview. Pay to see almost anything. $27 a month?
You can do the exact same things within Chrome Dev Tools for free, just as fast, no email required.
Pros:
Offers a website for what you can do in Chrome Dev Tools
This is absurd as a subscription-based product. There are dozens of CLI tools that do exactly this for free, such as https://github.com/FullHuman/pur... And because they're CLI based you can include it in your task runner so that it only runs when new iterations of a project are built. Compiled CSS shouldn't change outside of new builds, certainly not enough to warrant paying for "daily scheduled optimizations."
Report
Its doesn't important when you use global CDN and all general and popular css libs cached on browser many times per day.
So, generaly load bootstrap.css from google cdn more faster than custom build of bootstrap.css
Report
I don’t recommand this website. They charge me cancellation fees ( $18) and they never stop the recurring payment after that...
I thought this was a good idea, then I used it. Literally doesn't work - their site didn't load it's own CSS file. Finally used a different browser. You have to log in and sign up to even see the results they email to you. But it's a limited preview. Pay to see almost anything. $27 a month?
You can do the exact same things within Chrome Dev Tools for free, just as fast, no email required.
Pros:Offers a website for what you can do in Chrome Dev Tools
Cons:Doesn't work, limited preview, costs $27, gives errors