Trackwize is an AI-powered workforce intelligence platform for service teams. Automate time logs, decode team performance, score project fit, and plan shifts built on published research.
When we started building Trackwize, we weren't trying to create another time tracking tool. We were trying to answer a much bigger question:
Why do high performing teams still struggle with visibility into how work actually happens?
Most tools tell you what was done. Very few help you understand how work flows, where productivity breaks down, or how teams can improve without adding more meetings or micromanagement.
That became our mission.
Over the last few months, we spoke with founders, managers, and distributed teams to understand their biggest challenges. One theme kept coming up: they wanted actionable insights, not surveillance. So we built Trackwize around AI-powered workforce intelligence, helping organizations uncover work patterns, optimize team deployment, and make better decisions from real work data.
The product evolved significantly along the way. We simplified the experience, shifted our focus from tracking activity to delivering meaningful insights, and obsessed over making every metric explain why something happened...not just what happened.
We're excited to learn from the community, iterate quickly, and build Trackwize alongside the people who use it every day.
If you've ever managed a team and wished you had better visibility without compromising trust, I'd love to hear your thoughts. Your feedback will help shape what we build next.
Report
How does the project fit scoring actually work under the hood, like what data does it pull from and how accurate has it been for your early users?
Report
Maker
@beratzgll Great question. Our project fit scoring isn't based on a single metric, it's a contextual model. We combine historical project outcomes, role and skill alignment, delivery patterns, collaboration signals, workload, and behavioral work patterns to understand where an individual is most likely to perform at their best. As organizations continue using Trackwize, the model learns from every completed project, making recommendations increasingly tailored to that team's unique way of working.
We're currently validating the scoring model through early design partners and pilot deployments. Our focus at this stage isn't claiming a perfect accuracy percentage it's proving that data-driven team deployment consistently outperforms gut-feel staffing decisions. That's the hypothesis we're testing with our early customers.
Report
How does Trackwize actually handle shift planning across time zones, and does it integrate with tools like Slack or Jira out of the box?
Report
Maker
@metehangengil Great question! Shift planning across time zones isn't something we've built into the product yet, our current focus is on workforce intelligence, project fit, and understanding work patterns. Integrations with tools like Jira and Slack are high on our roadmap, as we want Trackwize to fit seamlessly into the tools teams already use rather than becoming another silo.
Report
Ran it against my small support team and the shift planner actually flagged a coverage gap I had been missing for weeks. The project fit score feels more grounded than other tools I've tried since it pulls from the team member's own time data.
Report
Maker
@leventerdapyuc Love hearing that. The goal is to surface the gaps that are easy to miss and make team decisions more data-driven.
Report
Curious how the project fit scoring actually works under the hood - is it based on historical performance data you pull from our existing tools, or more of a static model we have to train ourselves?
Report
Took it for a quick spin and the shift planning actually caught my eye, it factored in workload patterns I usually track manually in a spreadsheet. The research-backed angle gives it some weight too.
Report
Finally tried Trackwize and the automatic time logging is impressively accurate, saved me a few hours a week. The project fit scoring feels especially useful for staffing decisions.
How does the project fit scoring actually work under the hood, like what data does it pull from and how accurate has it been for your early users?
@beratzgll Great question. Our project fit scoring isn't based on a single metric, it's a contextual model. We combine historical project outcomes, role and skill alignment, delivery patterns, collaboration signals, workload, and behavioral work patterns to understand where an individual is most likely to perform at their best. As organizations continue using Trackwize, the model learns from every completed project, making recommendations increasingly tailored to that team's unique way of working.
We're currently validating the scoring model through early design partners and pilot deployments. Our focus at this stage isn't claiming a perfect accuracy percentage it's proving that data-driven team deployment consistently outperforms gut-feel staffing decisions. That's the hypothesis we're testing with our early customers.
How does Trackwize actually handle shift planning across time zones, and does it integrate with tools like Slack or Jira out of the box?
@metehangengil Great question! Shift planning across time zones isn't something we've built into the product yet, our current focus is on workforce intelligence, project fit, and understanding work patterns. Integrations with tools like Jira and Slack are high on our roadmap, as we want Trackwize to fit seamlessly into the tools teams already use rather than becoming another silo.
Ran it against my small support team and the shift planner actually flagged a coverage gap I had been missing for weeks. The project fit score feels more grounded than other tools I've tried since it pulls from the team member's own time data.
@leventerdapyuc Love hearing that. The goal is to surface the gaps that are easy to miss and make team decisions more data-driven.
Curious how the project fit scoring actually works under the hood - is it based on historical performance data you pull from our existing tools, or more of a static model we have to train ourselves?
Took it for a quick spin and the shift planning actually caught my eye, it factored in workload patterns I usually track manually in a spreadsheet. The research-backed angle gives it some weight too.
Finally tried Trackwize and the automatic time logging is impressively accurate, saved me a few hours a week. The project fit scoring feels especially useful for staffing decisions.