Context.devOne API to scrape, enrich, and extract the internet
Promoted
Structeris
The Smarter way to prepare for finance applications.
7 followers
The Smarter way to prepare for finance applications.
7 followers
Structeris helps finance candidates practise video interviews. Record answers to common finance questions, get instant, detailed AI feedback on structure, clarity, confidence, and delivery, then track your improvement over time. Built for students preparing for finance internships and graduate schemes.
How does the AI feedback actually work for finance-specific stuff like modeling questions or DCF walkthroughs? Curious whether it's catching technical accuracy or just surface-level delivery stuff.
@canhseyinzvpx
Hi Can Hüseyin, great question - this was one of the main things we wanted to avoid.
Structeris is not just using a general AI prompt to give surface-level feedback. It uses a structured AI evaluation system built around finance-specific rubrics, so the feedback looks at both technical substance and HireVue-style delivery.
For technical questions like DCF walkthroughs, valuation, accounting links, LBO basics and modelling-style answers, the system checks whether the candidate covered the right key points, used the correct logic, missed important steps, or gave an answer that sounded confident but was technically weak.
For example, on a DCF walkthrough, it is designed to look for things like forecasting free cash flows, discounting by WACC, calculating terminal value, moving from enterprise value to equity value and explaining the process in a clear order.
Separately, it also reviews communication and delivery - structure, clarity, conciseness, confidence, and how the answer would come across in a HireVue-style setting.
The goal is to combine technical finance accuracy with realistic HireVue delivery practice.
We’re still early and continuing to improve the rubrics question-by-question as more users test it, so feedback like this is really helpful.
Hopefully that answers your question, please keep asking if anything needs clarifying, as this is exactly the kind of feedback that helps us improve Structeris.
How does the feedback actually work though, is it just flagging filler words or are you grading things like the STAR structure and technical accuracy on finance-specific questions?
@zkan329792
Thanks Özkan, great question.
It goes beyond filler words. We look at delivery signals like clarity, conciseness and confidence, but the main goal is to grade the actual answer quality too.
For behavioural answers, that means checking whether the response follows a strong structure like STAR: situation, task, action, result and whether the example actually answers the question.
For finance-specific questions, the feedback looks at technical accuracy, missing key points, logical order and whether the answer would hold up in a real HireVue-style setting.
Would love for you to try it and share what you think - feedback on whether the scoring feels genuinely useful would be super helpful.
How does the feedback actually compare to what real interviewers at banks are taught to look for? Worried it might just be generic speech coaching dressed up as finance-specific.
@ltfiyetmub
Thanks Lütfiye, that’s a really fair concern, and exactly what we’re trying to avoid.
Real finance interviewers are usually not just looking for whether someone sounds polished. They’re looking for whether the candidate understands the technical logic, explains it in a clear order, answers the actual question, avoids major gaps and communicates under pressure in a way that feels credible.
That’s the standard we’re trying to reflect in Structeris. For example, on a DCF or valuation question, the feedback will not just say “good confidence” or “reduce filler words”. It should check whether the answer covers the right finance points, whether the logic flows properly, whether anything important is missing and whether the explanation would make sense in a real interview/HireVue setting.
So delivery matters because HireVues are video-based, but it should sit alongside technical accuracy, not replace it.
We’re still improving the rubrics as more users test it, so I’d genuinely love for you to try it and tell us whether the feedback feels finance-specific enough or where it still feels too generic.
love that you record the actual video and score delivery, not just the words. that's the part most practice tools skip and it's usually what separates a good answer from a great one
@ensarxikq
Thanks Ensar, really appreciate that.
That’s exactly the gap we’re trying to focus on. In a HireVue, it’s not only about having the right words - it’s also how structured, calm, confident, and natural the answer feels on camera.
A lot of prep tools stop at the transcript, but candidates are judged in a video setting, so delivery matters a lot.
We wanted Structeris to help users improve both: the content of the answer and the way it comes across.
The feedback categories feel really well thought out - structure, clarity, confidence, and delivery are exactly what trip people up. Wish this existed when I was prepping for first rounds.
@donekolak10616
Thanks Döne, really appreciate that.
That’s exactly the problem we’re trying to solve. A lot of candidates know roughly what they want to say, but the actual HireVue format makes it harder because you have to be structured, clear, confident and concise on camera with limited time.
We wanted Structeris to make that practice loop easier: record, get specific feedback, improve, and repeat before the real first round. Glad the categories resonate - would love for you to try it, share any feedback, and pass it on to anyone else preparing for finance HireVues.