Wispr Flow: Dictation That Works EverywhereStop typing. Start speaking. 4x faster.
SiftFirst
Stop drowning in AI resumes, start hiring the right people
29 followers
Stop drowning in AI resumes, start hiring the right people
29 followers
Small businesses now get 200+ applications per role, most AI-generated. SiftFirst ranks candidates against your criteria and quotes the evidence for every score. No signup required to try. You set the rubric, you make the call, you see the reasoning. New this month: an Ask tab to chat with your shortlist, team sharing with interview review, AI-prefilled interview scorecards, and pool analytics.
Interactive
Free
Launch Team / Built With
As someone who's hired without any HR help, the 200-applications problem is painfully real. Bookmarking this.
@hannah_lore Thank you, Hannah! The no-HR case is exactly who I built this for, you feel the flood, and you are also the one who has to read every line. Genuine question since you have hired: what is the first thing you look for to tell a real candidate from a polished-but-empty one? That is the signal I am most trying to make visible.
@virko_kask The first thing is whether they engaged with the actual role or just pasted a generic pitch that could've gone to any company. The empty ones are always interchangeable. Can you weight "fit to this specific role" separately from generic strength?
@hannah_lore @hannah_lore That is exactly the design: because you write the criteria for this specific role, fit is not a separate axis, it IS the score. A generically impressive candidate who does not match your must-haves scores lower than a plainer one who nails them. And since every score quotes the resume line, the "could have gone to any company" ones give themselves away, their evidence reads vague or borrowed. Genuine question back: would a "this reads generic" flag be useful to you, or would you rather just see the thin evidence and make the call yourself?
I once spent 1/2 week reading applications for one role, half of them clearly AI-written. If this cuts that to an hour I'm sold. Trying it now.
@varje_sinisalu Half a week, that is exactly the evening-and-weekend tax I built this to kill. Thank you for actually trying it, that means more than any upvote. Once you have run a batch, I would genuinely love the honest verdict: did the ranking match your gut, and did the evidence quotes save you the re-reading? If anything felt off, that is the feedback I most want.