Scop.ai
Generate task & model specific system prompts in seconds
29 followers
Generate task & model specific system prompts in seconds
29 followers
Generate task & model specific AI system prompts for leading LLMs, browse over 200 tested prompt templates, and collaborate on prompts with team members through shared prompt collections.
Grok 4 system prompt generation & templates are live on Scop.ai!
Generate custom task & model specific prompts, or browse a number of templates - each one engineered specifically for Grok 4's unique architecture, including:
Real-Time Market Intelligence Scanner
Research Paper Synthesizer Pro
Competitive Intelligence Command Center
Technology Stack Investigator
Patent Landscape Mapper
Executive Decision Support System
Strategic SWOT Analyzer
OKR Alignment Optimizer
Pitch Deck Perfection Engine
M&A Due Diligence Assistant
API Documentation Genius
Intelligent Code Review Bot
Bug Pattern Analyzer
Architecture Decision Advisor
Security Vulnerability Hunter
LinkedIn Virality Engineer
Newsletter Engagement Maximizer
Brand Voice Consistency Guardian
Story Arc Engineer
SEO Content Optimizer
Prompt Engineering Sensei
Model Performance Diagnostician
Workflow Automation Architect
AI Integration Specialist
Multi-Agent System Designer
+ more!
Each template leverages what makes Grok 4 special:
✅ Deep thinking
✅ Real-time data synthesis from web + X
✅ Code interpreter for verification
Sign up here → https://scop.ai/
This is such a huge time saver for prompt engineers. Are these templates optimized for GPT-4, Claude and Gemini?
@amelia_smith19 Yes!
Generated Prompts & templates are optimized specifically for GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok and 10+ other LLMs with model-specific formatting and tuning. Each gets tailored to work best with your chosen model.
Also, see our model leaderboard for which model performs best for your task! :) 🏆
What an amazing resource for AI teams and developers. Is there a way to track or rate prompt performance based on usage?
@abigail_martinez1 Hi Abigail,
Great suggestion!
We're actually building prompt evaluations and performance tracking as part of our Q3 '25 rollout, but being able to rate prompts, see usage analytics, and track what's working best for your team would be super valuable!
We're definitely exploring adding more performance insights based on feedback like this. Any specific metrics would be most helpful for your workflow? 🙂
How does the system handle model updates like from GPT-4 to GPT-4.5 that might change how a prompt behaves? Are there tools available to flag or revalidate prompts after an update?
@jacob_hernandez4
Hey Jacob,
One of the things that makes prompt management tricky for sure!
Right now our prompts are optimized per model based on the initial task requirements. If you want to convert a prompt to a different model, just select the new model when generating and give Scop.ai your current prompt - it will refactor based on the strengths of the new model, which handles most compatibility issues. :)
We're building versioning, then prompt evaluations elements of performance tracking & update recommendations in Q3 for even more precision & control. Appreciate the thoughtful question & looking forward to sharing more updates on this!
I love the concept. Can prompts have dynamic variables or placeholders that get filled in during runtime?
@sadie_scott Thank you Sadie! Currently you can instruct Scop.ai to add variable placeholders during initial generation, or manually add them afterward.
Enhanced custom variable features and fine-tuning controls plus versioning for even more dynamic control are coming soon as well 🛠️
Amazing concept. How do you manage the differences in LLM behavior across providers like OpenAI, Claude or Mistral?
@logan_king
Hi Logan!
Our generation process creates custom prompts tailored to each model's specific strengths and benchmarks - so a Claude prompt leverages its reasoning abilities differently than a GPT prompt optimizes for creativity, for example!
We also use one-shot and multi-shot testing on proven prompts for generations to ensure they work consistently across providers, and often update our own generation instructions based on real testing results!
Curious which models are you working with most?
This is really impressive work. Does this allow for prompt testing across multiple models side by side?
@juan_smith1 Hey Juan, Really appreciate that!
We don't have side-by-side testing yet, but honestly that's such a smart feature idea and would be incredibly valuable for optimization.
Thanks for the suggestion & looking forward to sharing more on this soon!