Hi Product Hunt 👋

I built Rugsight because checking a new Solana token still means opening five tabs, and the most common number people quote, "top 10 holders own 90%", is usually wrong: it counts liquidity pools and pump.fun bonding curves as whales.

What it does

- Paste a mint address or a DexScreener / Jupiter / pump.fun / Birdeye / Solscan link and get a 0–100 score and an A–F grade (or IC for allowlisted issuer-controlled assets such as USDC). Free, no sign-up, no wallet. Cached checks are often well under a second; a first check of a large mint can take several seconds.

- It checks mint and freeze authority, risky Token-2022 extensions (transfer fees, permanent delegate, transfer hooks, pausable), holder concentration in real wallets only, liquidity and age, and whether the main pool's LP is burned or held by verified lockers (classic AMM pools; concentrated pools are N/A). Token pages also show whether on-chain metadata is mutable (Metaplex or Token-2022); that line is information only and does not change the score.

- The full report (1 USDC on the web via Solana Pay, no account) adds exact top-wallet shares, the top-20 holders with owner type, authority addresses, market metrics, LP burned/locked percentages, and a launch-bundle / sniper heuristic for tokens up to 7 days old (very busy tokens may return status unknown; funding links between wallets are not checked).

- For AI agents: an MCP server at /mcp (version 1.9.3; tools get_token_risk_score and get_token_risk_report) and a pay-per-call JSON API at 0.03 USDC over x402 (HTTP 402), no API key. There are npm and PyPI clients, plus a Telegram bot (@rugsight_bot) for /check and /new in DMs and groups.

- The site also has 25 free guides (including why LP lock percentages don't apply to Orca Whirlpool or Meteora DLMM, how to read a Solana token on Solscan or DexScreener, how to check if metadata is mutable, how to tell if a pump.fun token has graduated, how to read the A–F score, how to verify a contract address vs a same-ticker lookalike, holder concentration, liquidity, honeypots, and bundled wallets), 59 curated token pages, 62 side-by-side comparisons, and a short alternatives hub. Same-ticker copycats we don't curate get a short mint in the page title and a note linking to the official token when we have one.

What the data says. Rugsight checks new Solana launches every 30 minutes and publishes the aggregate at /stats. Last 7 days (from /api/stats, generated 2026-11-13 14:00 America/Fortaleza), of 2,202 new tokens with at least $5k of liquidity at discovery:

- 35.9% were graded D or F (791)

- 34.7% had more than half the supply in 10 wallets (765)

- 0.4% still had an active mint authority (9)

Launchpads revoke authorities by default now, so the risk has moved to concentration and thin liquidity. (54.4% had under $10k liquidity or none at check time; the median score was 68/100.)

What it doesn't do (yet): deployer history, and clustering wallets by shared funding source (the launch-bundle check only looks at early buyers in the first slots, not who funded them). A good grade means "no technical trap found on the checks we run", not "safe to buy". It's not financial advice, and a listing here is not a sales record — the product is live and free to try.

It runs on a free tier, so it costs nothing to keep online. Docs: https://rugsight.rugsight.worker... · Guides: https://rugsight.rugsight.worker... · Compare: https://rugsight.rugsight.worker... · Bot: https://t.me/rugsight_bot

Feedback I'd love: which signal would you trust least, and what would you check that Rugsight doesn't? If you're building agents: is pay-per-call over x402 easier for you than an API key?