We're a few hours into launch and honestly didn't expect this.
15-20 signups an hour, engineers actually putting Revolte on real codebases, and a comment section full of the exact questions we hoped people would ask. The momentum today has been unreal.
The problem we're solving is the one every engineering team knows too well: writing code was never the bottleneck. It's everything around it, environments, tests, deploys, incidents. That's the work Revolte takes off your plate, and engineers are feeling that click in real time today.
Revolte
Spent the last few months on Interactive Sessions. The question that drove the design: how fast can we get an engineer from sign up to seeing the agents do something genuinely useful in their own workflow?
Where we landed: sign in, open a tab, start a session. No Jira setup, no CI config, no long onboarding. The tabbed workspace works like your browser, one session per task, switch between them, close what you're done with.
You drive the full lifecycle step by step: architecture, code, tests, staging, preview, deploy. When the agents hit a judgment call, you get a focused prompt. When they're ready to touch your code, you see the plan, then the diff, then you approve or modify.
Autopilot is still there for the async work, connect Jira and tickets flow through end to end. But Interactive Sessions is the mode you'll live in day to day, and the one you can try in a minute without committing to anything.
Would love to hear what people think of the flow once you've tried it.
Lancepilot
Revolte
@priyankamandal Thanks for rightly pointing the governance angle. That is exactly the gap we are looking to close.
Revolte
@The @priyankamandal Great that you have noticed it. Yes, governance makes all the difference for enterprises and startups who wanted to have absolute control of their tech stack and customer data. @Revolte we are not just want AI to code but to use AI to automate entire SDLC where governance and security becomes the most important layers.
Lancepilot
Excited to hunt Revolte today! :)
I see a lot of AI dev tools come through here, and most of them do one slice of the job well: autocomplete in the editor, or an autonomous agent you hand a task to. Revolte is the first one I've come across that treats the whole delivery lifecycle as the thing, from intent all the way to production, with the engineer staying in control throughout.
What sold me was the balance. Their new Interactive Sessions let you drive the build hands-on and approve every step, while Autopilot handles the routine work end to end. Same governance layer under both. It's already trusted by engineers at places like Amazon, Google and PayPal, and the delivery numbers they're seeing are hard to ignore.
Worth a look if you've ever wanted AI to actually ship software, not just write snippets. Congrats on the launch, team!
Revolte
@istiakahmad Thanks. We are excited for the launch as well. The interactive session opens up factory model with lesser configuration and creates ease of use.
Revolte
Good day PH Wizards,
Excited to finally launch Revolte — one platform for both interactive and autonomous AI development. 🚀
The pitch for Revolte isn't "we're better than any one of them." It's "you don't need three tools."
Interactive Sessions cover the hands-on work.
Autopilot covers the async work.
Both share one governance layer, one audit trail, one budget system, one procurement conversation.
The thing early customers point to isn't a specific feature. It's not having to run separate rollout plans for interactive versus autonomous AI adoption. Same platform, same rules, teams pick the mode that fits the work in front of them.
Curious to hear your take — are you seeing the same thing inside your org? 👀
HarnessRouter
Revolte
@kuanzema Thanks. Great to hear your feedback. You could use our CLI for greater control(human in the loop) for factory model.
Revolte
The hardest engineering question in building Revolte was this: how do you make Interactive Sessions and Autopilot feel like one product, not two things bolted together?
The answer is that they share a substrate. Both run on the same agent stack, the same governance layer, the same Platform-as-Code contracts. When you switch from driving a session step by step in Interactive to handing off a Jira ticket in Autopilot, you're not moving to a different system. It's the same agents, with a different amount of your attention on them.
That's what makes it a real adoption story for enterprises. You're not deploying two tools with two governance models. You're deploying one platform that meets your teams where they are, some hands-on, some hands-off, all inside the same boundaries.
Happy to go deep on the architecture if anyone's curious.
The out-of-the-box preview and staging setup sounds awesome ! If it really eliminates the need to wrestle with custome Docker/K8s configs, that's a huge time saver. 🚀
Revolte
@boopathi_raja007 yes. we think that would be great differentiator. Also, in revolte you could directly deploy to your AWS or GCP accounts with out zero overhead.