ReadiVest: Know if you're fundable before you pitch

Hey Product Hunters! 👋 I built ReadiVest after watching too many talented founders get rejected. Not because their startups were bad, but because they had no idea how investment committees actually think. Most pitch feedback founders receive is about storytelling, slide design, or optimism. But inside an IC meeting, the conversation is completely different. It's about risk, market reality, unit economics, and whether the team can actually execute. Founders walk in prepared for one conversation and get evaluated on another. ReadiVest bridges that gap. We deliver a 10–15 page IC-grade funding readiness verdict, written the way investment committees discuss deals internally so founders know exactly what investors will scrutinise before they start pitching. The process is fully async. No calls, no fluff. You submit your pitch deck and financials, answer a structured intake form, and within 3-5 business days you receive a clear verdict: ❌ Not Ready / ⚠️ Needs Work / ✅ Ready — along with a 30/60/90-day action plan to close the gaps. We built this for founders raising $250K–$5M who are tired of surface-level feedback and want to hear the truth before it costs them a deal. Would love to hear your thoughts, questions, and feedback. If you're preparing to raise or know someone who is, I'm happy to answer anything in the comments. 🙏