Launched this week
Raize Orion Compliance
Compliance that keeps up with your roadmap.
16 followers
Compliance that keeps up with your roadmap.
16 followers
GRC platform built for SaaS teams. Compliance automation for ISO 27001, SOC 2, NIST 800-53, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, ISO 22301, NIS2, Cyber Essentials and IASME Cyber Assurance — automated evidence collection, AI-assisted policy authoring, continuous compliance monitoring, auditor portal, and a public trust center. UK-based, EU data residency.
Hi Product Hunt 👋 I'm Olu. I'm the Founder/CEO of Raize Orion.
Six months ago, I was helping a digital-health team get audit-ready and kept hitting the same wall: every GRC tool wanted me to pick one framework, then pay per-add for the next. So a team running ISO 27001 and GDPR and SOC 2 was collecting the same evidence three times, into three silos, for three audits.
Raize Orion is the opposite bet. Ten frameworks ISO 27001, SOC 2, NIST 800-53, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, ISO 22301, NIS2, Cyber Essentials, IASME sharing one evidence base, one policy library, one risk register. Satisfy ISO 27001 5.17 once, and it covers SOC 2 CC6.5, PCI DSS 8.4.1, and HIPAA §164.312(d) automatically. 19 evidence connectors pull from your stack on a daily cron. Built UK-side with EU data residency.
The piece I'm proudest of is the least flashy: the NIS2 reporting clock. Most platforms stamp "app-open time" as the moment you became aware of an incident, which collapses in five minutes under an auditor. Ours anchors on the upstream signal time with a documented per-source SLA so a 7-hour ack on a customer ticket and a 7-hour ack on a SIEM alert aren't treated as the same event. That's the difference between passing and failing the assessment.
You can poke at what an auditor actually sees without signing up for a sanitised preview here: raizehq.dev/auditor-demo.
What I'm not going to oversell: we're SOC 2 Type II in progress, to be certified. So if something's rough, it's on me, and I'd genuinely rather hear it now.
So a real question for the GRC and security folks here: if you've run more than one framework at once, where did the duplicated-evidence pain actually bite hardest: the collection, the mapping, or the audit walkthrough? That answer shapes what I build next.
I'll be here all day to answer anything. Thanks for taking a look.