Hey Product Hunt, I built ProReview because AI-generated engineering output is becoming part of normal development work, but the review skill around it is still underdeveloped. The dangerous output is often not obviously broken. The syntax can be correct, the explanation can sound reasonable, and the command or migration can still be unsafe because of a missing production assumption. ProReview turns that into short review drills. You review realistic AI-generated engineering changes across: - production debugging - cloud and infrastructure - data migrations - Git and CI - security traps For each drill, you decide whether you would approve the output before seeing the hidden risk and the reviewer reasoning. The goal is to train engineering judgment, not trivia: tenant scope, rollback safety, blast radius, permissions, data loss, CI trust boundaries, and other risks that matter in production. I’d love feedback from engineers, founders, and teams using AI coding agents in real workflows.

ProReview

Practice catching risky AI-generated engineering output

Practice catching risky AI-generated engineering output