Priora forces you to define your MVP before you write code. Dump every feature idea. Rank them blind, one at a time, so comparison bias cannot sneak in. Then face your Scope Score: what belongs in v1, what does not, and why. Free runs through prioritisation and Scope Score. Pro continues with Discovery, Scope Review with the Priora Assistant, and a PrioraDocs pack you can hand to Cursor or a freelancer. ChatGPT invents ideas. Priora makes you choose.
No reviews yetBe the first to leave a review for Priora
A blind ranking step is great, but what about letting users invite a co-founder or teammate to do the ranking separately and then merge the two into a disagreement view? Most MVPs die from two people quietly assuming they agree, and seeing where your gut differs from a partner's gut before writing code would be a real edge.
Report
Maker
@atakanrw0d That’s exactly the quiet failure mode. Solo blind ranking ships today; invite + independent ranks + a disagreement view is high on the list because “we thought we agreed” kills more MVPs than bad code. Logging it.
Report
the blind one-at-a-time ranking is a smart move, it actually kills the "well this next idea sounds cooler" bias that ruins every brainstorm. clean way to force real decisions before any code gets written.
Report
Maker
@pakizeji7s That’s the bias. One feature at a time, no “this next one sounds cooler.” Glad it landed.
Report
The blind one-at-a-time ranking is genuinely clever, basically removes that sneaky "this one sounds better because I just saw it" bias. Props for turning a normally mushy process into something that actually forces a decision.
Report
Maker
@aykut526431 "Just saw it" bias is exactly what one-at-a-time ranking is for. Mushy scoping is the default; forced decisions are the product. Appreciate you saying it clearly.
A blind ranking step is great, but what about letting users invite a co-founder or teammate to do the ranking separately and then merge the two into a disagreement view? Most MVPs die from two people quietly assuming they agree, and seeing where your gut differs from a partner's gut before writing code would be a real edge.
@atakanrw0d That’s exactly the quiet failure mode. Solo blind ranking ships today; invite + independent ranks + a disagreement view is high on the list because “we thought we agreed” kills more MVPs than bad code. Logging it.
the blind one-at-a-time ranking is a smart move, it actually kills the "well this next idea sounds cooler" bias that ruins every brainstorm. clean way to force real decisions before any code gets written.
@pakizeji7s That’s the bias. One feature at a time, no “this next one sounds cooler.” Glad it landed.
The blind one-at-a-time ranking is genuinely clever, basically removes that sneaky "this one sounds better because I just saw it" bias. Props for turning a normally mushy process into something that actually forces a decision.
@aykut526431 "Just saw it" bias is exactly what one-at-a-time ranking is for. Mushy scoping is the default; forced decisions are the product. Appreciate you saying it clearly.