Priora forces you to define your MVP before you write code. Dump every feature idea. Rank them blind, one at a time, so comparison bias cannot sneak in. Then face your Scope Score: what belongs in v1, what does not, and why. Free runs through prioritisation and Scope Score. Pro continues with Discovery, Scope Review with the Priora Assistant, and a PrioraDocs pack you can hand to Cursor or a freelancer. ChatGPT invents ideas. Priora makes you choose.
No reviews yetBe the first to leave a review for Priora
Maker
📌
Hey Product Hunt 👋
I kept shipping features that felt "obvious" and then watching the build drag for weeks. The problem was never code. It was deciding what belonged in v1 before I opened the editor.
Priora is the workflow I wanted: brain dump → blind rank (so you cannot compare features while scoring) → Scope Score → then, if you want the full handoff, Discovery, Review, and a PrioraDocs pack.
Free covers the hard part: prioritisation and the score. Pro finishes the handoff.
Would love honest takes from people who have felt scope creep. What is the feature you almost built that you now know should have waited?
Report
💡 Bright idea
Love the blind ranking approach to kill comparison bias, that's the part that actually makes Priora different from a spreadsheet. One thing that would help me as a user: add a way to revisit a previous run and see which ideas I cut, because weeks later I always forget what I dismissed and end up re-considering the same things. A simple "graveyard" view with the option to resurrect an item back into the active list would close that loop nicely.
Report
Maker
@sercanzrn2 That loop is real. Weeks later the cut list disappears from memory and the same features sneak back in. A graveyard with resurrect is a clean fix. Logging it: cut history per project, resurrect back into the active list.
Report
Tried the blind ranking thing and it actually broke a tie I'd been going back and forth on for days. The Scope Score at the end felt like a gut check I didn't ask for but probably needed.
Report
Maker
@aysegulnur55627 Glad the blind ranking broke the tie. That back-and-forth usually means the features were never compared on their own merits. Scope Score is meant to feel like a gut check. If it confirmed what you already suspected, you did the hard part.
Report
Love the blind ranking approach, that's a smart way to fight feature creep early. One thing I'd love to see: the ability to export the ranked list and Scope Score as a simple markdown table or CSV, so I can drop it straight into a Notion doc or share with a co-founder without retyping anything. Right now it feels like the output lives inside the tool only.
Report
Maker
@sadkturgunfqbe Fair ask. Free already has Copy priority list after Scope Score (plain text with ranks and scores), but you are right that there is no markdown table or CSV, and the Scope Score itself is not in that export yet. Sharing with a co-founder without retyping should not require Pro. Logging markdown/CSV export for the free handoff.
Report
Ran a quick session dumping random app ideas and the blind ranking actually forced me to admit my "must have" was just nice to have. Scope Score landing at the end felt like a gut check I did not know I needed.
Report
Maker
@fcalapverd79575 That must-have to nice-to-have flip is exactly what blind ranking is for. Scope Score as a gut check you did not ask for is the intended feeling. Glad a quick dump still forced an honest call.
Report
Love the blind ranking idea, that bias creeps into every brainstorm I run. One thing that would make the free tier way more useful is letting me export the ranked list as a simple Markdown or CSV file so I can share it with co-founders without needing Pro.
Report
Maker
@metinelikt7fjw Same ask as above, and it is fair. Free already lets you copy the ranked list as plain text after Scope Score, but there is no Markdown or CSV file yet, and sharing with a co-founder should not require Pro. Logging free export (MD/CSV) so the handoff does not live only inside the tool.
Report
the blind ranking idea is honestly pretty clever, bias is the worst part of feature prioritisation. one thing i'd love to see is the ability to export the dumped ideas and rankings as a simple csv or even just a markdown list, because right now if i want to share the scope discussion with a cofounder who isn't using the tool, i'm basically screenshotting stuff. would make it way easier to actually use this in a real planning session
Report
Maker
@aydnrijotg Fair. Scope discussion should leave the tool without screenshots. Free .md and CSV export after Scope Score is shipping so you can drop the ranked list straight into a cofounder doc.
Love the blind ranking approach to kill comparison bias, that's the part that actually makes Priora different from a spreadsheet. One thing that would help me as a user: add a way to revisit a previous run and see which ideas I cut, because weeks later I always forget what I dismissed and end up re-considering the same things. A simple "graveyard" view with the option to resurrect an item back into the active list would close that loop nicely.
@sercanzrn2 That loop is real. Weeks later the cut list disappears from memory and the same features sneak back in. A graveyard with resurrect is a clean fix. Logging it: cut history per project, resurrect back into the active list.
Tried the blind ranking thing and it actually broke a tie I'd been going back and forth on for days. The Scope Score at the end felt like a gut check I didn't ask for but probably needed.
@aysegulnur55627 Glad the blind ranking broke the tie. That back-and-forth usually means the features were never compared on their own merits. Scope Score is meant to feel like a gut check. If it confirmed what you already suspected, you did the hard part.
Love the blind ranking approach, that's a smart way to fight feature creep early. One thing I'd love to see: the ability to export the ranked list and Scope Score as a simple markdown table or CSV, so I can drop it straight into a Notion doc or share with a co-founder without retyping anything. Right now it feels like the output lives inside the tool only.
@sadkturgunfqbe Fair ask. Free already has Copy priority list after Scope Score (plain text with ranks and scores), but you are right that there is no markdown table or CSV, and the Scope Score itself is not in that export yet. Sharing with a co-founder without retyping should not require Pro. Logging markdown/CSV export for the free handoff.
Ran a quick session dumping random app ideas and the blind ranking actually forced me to admit my "must have" was just nice to have. Scope Score landing at the end felt like a gut check I did not know I needed.
@fcalapverd79575 That must-have to nice-to-have flip is exactly what blind ranking is for. Scope Score as a gut check you did not ask for is the intended feeling. Glad a quick dump still forced an honest call.
Love the blind ranking idea, that bias creeps into every brainstorm I run. One thing that would make the free tier way more useful is letting me export the ranked list as a simple Markdown or CSV file so I can share it with co-founders without needing Pro.
@metinelikt7fjw Same ask as above, and it is fair. Free already lets you copy the ranked list as plain text after Scope Score, but there is no Markdown or CSV file yet, and sharing with a co-founder should not require Pro. Logging free export (MD/CSV) so the handoff does not live only inside the tool.
the blind ranking idea is honestly pretty clever, bias is the worst part of feature prioritisation. one thing i'd love to see is the ability to export the dumped ideas and rankings as a simple csv or even just a markdown list, because right now if i want to share the scope discussion with a cofounder who isn't using the tool, i'm basically screenshotting stuff. would make it way easier to actually use this in a real planning session
@aydnrijotg Fair. Scope discussion should leave the tool without screenshots. Free .md and CSV export after Scope Score is shipping so you can drop the ranked list straight into a cofounder doc.