AI lets us build software in hours instead of weeks, but it also introduces bugs that humans never think to test.
Traditional QA expects test cases, QA engineers, or large automation suites. Most indie developers and small teams don't have any of those.
I'm curious how everyone here validates apps before shipping.
Manual testing?
Playwright/Cypress?
Real user feedback?
Just ship and fix later?
finally tried this on a side project and the video proof thing is genuinely useful, way better than scrolling through console logs trying to repro a bug a user reported. pasted one fix straight into cursor and it worked first try
@bsanverdi65035 Thanks so much! That was exactly the experience we hoped to create. Instead of digging through logs or trying to reproduce issues manually, Opsis should show you what happened, explain why, and give you a fix you can use right away. Really happy to hear the Cursor workflow worked on the first try. Thanks for giving Opsis a spin!
Finally a tool that gets the "I shipped at 2am and pray" workflow. The session replay with fix suggestions was surprisingly spot on for a tiny test app.
@yasemineryitn Thanks! That's exactly the workflow we built Opsis for. 😊 We want builders to ship fast without wondering what broke after deployment. Really glad the replay and fix suggestions were useful!