Hey Product Hunt 👋 I'm Kalib, a solo dev from the Philippines. A while back I watched ChatGPT attribute a quote to N.T. Wright that Wright never wrote. It was confident. It was formatted like a real citation. It was completely invented. That's when it clicked for me: millions of people are now asking AI to explain Scripture, and almost nobody is asking who trained the model or where the answer came from. Whoever controls the model controls the theology. Meanwhile the tools you can trust — Logos, Accordance — run $120 to $10,000. For a pastor in rural Philippines prepping Sunday's sermon, that isn't a choice. The real choice is expensive-and-deep or free-and-unreliable. So I built a third option. OpenLumin treats the AI as a librarian, not a theologian. It retrieves from named scholars — Matthew Henry, John Gill, Michael Heiser, ancient Near Eastern context, Theographic data — and every claim traces to a source you can open yourself. It does not generate theology. That restriction is the product; everything else in the architecture exists to enforce it. You can try it with no signup at openlumin.com/ask — ask anything, watch the sources come back with the answer. It's free. Not free-trial free. Free. Where I'd genuinely love your take: the hard problem turned out not to be retrieval — it's disagreement. When two credible scholars contradict each other on a passage, should the tool present both and stay silent, or surface the disagreement itself as the finding? I've rewritten that logic three times and I'm still not sure. Curious what you'd want as a user. Thanks for taking a look 🙏

OpenLumin

AI retrieves evidence. You interpret.

AI retrieves evidence. You interpret.