Nexus Void Automated Penetration Testing

Professional pentest reports. $150. Results in 3 - 4 hours.

4 followers

Professional pentest reports. $150. Results in 3 - 4 hours.

4 followers

Pay-per-scan vulnerability assessment. Security testing has always been priced out of reach for companies that need it most. NexusVoid deploys 150+ attacking agents, Nuclei, OWASP ZAP, SQLMap, Nmap, SSLyze, Subfinder, covering OWASP Top 10, CVE templates, SQL injection, TLS weaknesses, and subdomain exposure. Three compliance-ready reports in under 4 hours. SOC 2 · ISO 27001 · PCI DSS · GDPR mapped. $150 one-time. No subscription. No scoping calls.

Nexus Void Automated Penetration Testing gallery image

Payment Required

Launch tags:SaaS•Artificial Intelligence•Security

Launch Team

LightfieldAI-native CRM that builds itself and does work for you

Promoted

Maker

📌

Hey Product Hunt. Here's why we built this for Fintech, Healthtech & B2B industry, their clients, auditors, and compliance frameworks require periodic penetration testing. But the traditional route costs $5,000 - $30,000, takes 3 weeks, and involves lengthy scoping before a single probe is run.

Most companies skip it. Many do it once and treat the report as permanent not realising that every major release introduces new vulnerabilities the old report never saw.
NexusVoid changes the economics.

$150. 3-4 hours. 150+ attacking agents covering:
- OWASP Top 10 and OWASP API Top 10
- CVE templates, custom probes, zero-day patterns via Nuclei
- Web app scanning passive and active via OWASP ZAP
- SQL injection via SQLMap
- Full port and service detection via Nmap
- TLS/SSL cipher analysis via SSLyze
- Subdomain enumeration via Subfinder

Every finding mapped to CVSS v3.1 and methodology aligned to OWASP WSTG v4.2, PTES Standard, and NIST SP 800-115.
This is what professional pentesters actually use, deployed autonomously.
Happy to answer anything

Report

3mo ago

Forum Threads

p/nexus-void-automated-penetration-testing

•

3mo ago

Your last pentest is already outdated. Here's why that's a problem.

For decades, companies have been spending thousands of dollars on VAPT and penetration testing. And for decades, the process has been the same, hire a firm, wait weeks, get a report, file it away.

Then your engineering team ships a major update. New features. New integrations. New APIs. New code.

And that expensive report you just got? It's already describing a product that no longer exists.

The problem is nobody goes back to get a new one. It's too expensive. Too time-consuming. Too much back and forth. So companies just wait, until their auditor asks for an updated report, or a client flags it in a security questionnaire, or worse, someone finds something first.

View all