NativeProse
Rewrite your English to sound native, not just correct
499 followers
Rewrite your English to sound native, not just correct
499 followers
Most non-native speakers write English that's grammatically correct but sounds unnatural to native ears. Grammarly won't fix that. NativeProse rewrites your text the way a native would actually write it — and shows exactly what changed with a red/green diff view, so you can learn from every edit. ✦ Native mode: emails, Slack, day-to-day writing ✦ Academic mode: papers, reports, technical docs Free: 10 rewrites/day. No account needed.
How does it handle situations where the user actually has a specific tone in mind, like wanting to sound more formal or friendly than the default? Is there a way to give it direction beyond the two preset modes?
@elmas550846 More than two — there are 5 modes (Native, Academic, Pro, Simplify, Translate). Native and Professional both have a Casual / Formal toggle for tone. Academic is formal by design; Simplify is about clarity, not vibe.
No free-text "write it like X" yet — that's a fair feature request. For now I'd combo mode + casual/formal and use Retry if the first pass isn't right.
does it keep a consistent voice for one person across many rewrites, or could two people using the same account end up sounding identical because it's converging on the same idea of "native"? curious if there's any personalization beyond the native/academic toggle
@galdayan Right now: no cross-rewrite voice memory. Each run is mode + casual/formal + your input — no learned personal style. Two users on one account can definitely sound similar because everything converges on the same "native" prompts.
The diff helps you see what changed from your draft, but the app isn't building a profile of you yet. Personalization beyond the mode toggles is a fair feature request and not shipped today.
@linsir good, appreciate the straight answer instead of overselling what it does today. the diff-as-teaching-tool framing is honestly the more durable feature anyway, a voice-memory model would risk making the output feel less "native" over time if it just learns your own quirks back at you
As someone who writes in a second language every day, that stiff, technically correct but slightly off feeling is very real. Seeing exactly what changed so the natural phrasing sticks with me over time is what makes this genuinely useful.
@jean_noel_escande "Technically correct but slightly off" — that's the exact gap we were trying to close. Grammar tools fix errors; they don't teach you what a native speaker would actually write.
Really glad the diff is doing more than cosmetic for you. That's the idea: not just get a better sentence once, but notice why it reads more natural so it sticks. If you ever hit a pattern where it still feels off (over-formal, too casual, etc.), would love to hear — that's the stuff we're tuning prompts around.
finally something that gets my stiff business emails to sound like an actual human wrote them. the diff view is honestly the best part, i catch myself picking up phrases i would've never thought to use
@ravza1134309 This is exactly why we built the diff view — not just to show the output, but to make the changes teachable. "I would've never thought to use that phrase" is the best feedback we could get.
Stiff business email → human-sounding is basically the core use case we optimized for. Glad it's landing for you. If there's a specific email type where it still feels robotic (apologies, pushback, follow-ups), I'd love to know — that's where we're focusing next.