I built this because I noticed that different AI models have unique perspectives on the same topic - GPT excels at structured thinking, Claude at nuanced reasoning, Grok brings fresh angles. But getting their collective wisdom meant switching between multiple tabs and manually comparing responses. The Multi-LLM Consensus Engine streamlines this into a structured debate format: Draft → Critique → Devil's Advocate → Judge. Each model challenges the others, exposing blind spots and strengthening arguments. The visual mind maps make it easy to see where models agree (consensus zones) and where they diverge (areas needing deeper exploration). Try asking it something you're wrestling with - a product decision, ethical dilemma, or technical approach. The consensus percentage tells you how aligned the AI perspectives are, and the mind map reveals the full landscape of considerations.

Multi-LLM Consensus Engine

AI debates with consensus visualization and mind maps

AI debates with consensus visualization and mind maps