Launching today
Meeeters.com
SEO and GEO content that writes and publishes itself
23 followers
SEO and GEO content that writes and publishes itself
23 followers
Meeeters is your SEO automation platform.
It audits your site, finds the keywords you can actually rank for, builds topic clusters, then writes and publishes SEO and GEO articles straight to your WordPress, Webflow or Shopify.
Your content gets cited by Google and AI search like ChatGPT and Perplexity.
Built-in backlink outreach lifts your authority. No agency, no busywork, just rankings and traffic on autopilot.
Took it for a spin on my Shopify store and was surprised how fast it flagged keyword gaps I had totally missed. The auto-publish to WordPress bit actually works, which is more than I can say for most tools like this.
@recep758661 Thanks Recep, glad it's working well! Heads up though, free is way more limited than what you're seeing, Pro unlocks a lot more of that gap detection and drafting.
Hey Hunters 👋
I'm Christopher, maker of Meeeters.
SEO GEO works, but for a small team it's slow, expensive and scattered: one tool to audit, another for keywords, a writer for the articles, an agency for the rest. So most founders ship nothing and stay invisible on Google.
So I built Meeeters: SEO automation that runs the whole loop for you.
1. It audits your site (real authority, structure, quick wins, keyword strategy)
2. It finds the keywords you can actually rank for and builds topic clusters
3. It writes and publishes SEO and GEO articles straight to your WordPress, Webflow or Shopify
4. Backlink outreach is built in, so your new pages actually rank
Your content is also optimized to get cited by AI search like ChatGPT and Perplexity, not just Google. And you get a free SEO analysis on signup, so you know exactly where to start.
Today is a big one for us: we shipped a major update across the whole platform and opened the public alpha to everyone.
I'd love your feedback on:
Is "SEO on autopilot" clear on first read?
SEO folks: does auto-published content feel safe and high quality enough to you?
What would stop you from letting a tool publish to your own site?
Replying to everyone today 🙏 I also build in public on TikTok and X.
Best
Christopher
The tool isn't the problem, the intent is.
That's the bet behind Meeeters: auto-publish, but only content that answers a real search, with real data, straight to your CMS.
But I want to be wrong in the comments. So, three questions:
Would you let a tool publish directly to your live site? Or is "human in the loop before publish" non-negotiable for you?
GEO (getting cited by ChatGPT / Perplexity): real channel, or hype we'll laugh at in a year?
Backlinks in 2026: still the #1 ranking factor, or overrated legacy metric?
I'll defend my side in the replies.
Come disagree. 🙂
@christopherfernandes Congrats on the launch! Signed up, connected my site, and the suggested pages were genuinely on-topic and useful, good sign for the core idea.
One bug worth flagging: when I generated a draft, it looked like the model tried to output a markdown table but the formatting didn't get parsed , I ended up with raw pipe/dash characters (| :--- | :--- |) sitting in the content instead of an actual table. Might be worth a markdown-to-HTML pass before it hits the editor.
On your questions:
Human in the loop, non-negotiable for me, at least for now. Even when the topic and structure are solid, I still want to review and add context before anything goes live. Partly trust, partly the kind of formatting issue above, a quick review catches that in seconds.
GEO, I think it's real, not hype. LLM-driven answer engines are only going to pull more search-like traffic over time, so structuring content to get cited feels like an early-mover bet rather than a fad. Too early to call it the new SEO, but ignoring it seems riskier than investing in it.
Backlinks in 2026 still a factor, but overrated as the factor. Quality and topical relevance matter more than raw count now.
Edit : Patched
@andrei_constantin_alexandru Thanks Andrei, this is exactly the kind of feedback I was hoping for.
The table bug is real and it's on me.
The model outputs markdown, and the draft goes straight into the editor without a markdown to HTML pass, so you got the raw pipes.
Adding that conversion now, and checking the other syntax while I'm at it (lists, bold, headings, links are probably leaking the same way). Will ping you once it's live.
On human in the loop: same read here. The plan was never full autopilot by default. The autopilot is for the boring part, the research, the structure, the first draft. You still own the publish button, and the option to auto publish stays opt-in for people who want it later, not the default.
On GEO: agreed, and that's basically the bet. Content that gets cited by answer engines is structured differently from content that ranks, and doing both at once is cheap right now. Nobody knows the exact weight yet, but the downside of being early is close to zero.
On backlinks: exactly why they're one module and not the product. Relevance and quality over count. Chasing raw volume is how you end up with a nice number in a dashboard and nothing in traffic.
Appreciate you taking the time to actually use it and write this up.
@andrei_constantin_alexandru I patched it right now.
how much of this is actually automated vs stuff I still have to review before it goes live?
@benjamin_joseph_b Automated end to end: site scan, keyword/silo research, article drafting, internal linking, images, GSC/sitemap submission, and finding backlink prospects with outreach emails drafted for you.
Manual, always: reviewing/editing each draft and clicking publish (never auto-goes-live), and sending the outreach emails yourself (auto-send to your own mailbox is "coming soon", not live yet).
So: the writing and research is fully hands-off, the publishing and outreach-sending are the two gates you control.
Does it publish straight to my site, or do I approve each article first?
@elroy_sitbon Meeeters algorithm always draft first, never live automatically.
Meeeters writes the article, it lands in your CMS (WordPress, Webflow, etc.) or on your dashboard as a draft.
You review, edit if needed, then hit publish yourself. Nothing goes public without you clicking the button.
Thanks you !
What does the initial scan actually look at? Just on page stuff or the whole architecture?
@mickael_ohayon Whole architecture, not just on-page stuff. We pull your full sitemap and rebuild your site as a tree: what silos/sections already exist, whether you even have a blog section, and where the gaps are. From there we spot weak or missing silos and figure out what topic clusters you should build out.
So it's less "here's 12 on-page errors to fix" and more "here's your content architecture, here's what's missing, here's what to build next."
Can I connect my vercel on it?
@benjamin_joseph_b Not directly, and that's on purpose: Vercel is where your site is hosted, not where your content lives, so there's nothing to "connect" on the Vercel side. What people on Vercel usually do is use our webhook.
We POST the finished article to a URL you own as JSON (title, slug, HTML/MDX, meta, images) and your own code decides what to do with it: write an MDX file and commit it, drop it in your DB, revalidate the page. One way delivery, we never touch your repo or your deploys.
If your content sits in a CMS behind the Next app (Notion, Ghost, WordPress headless), connect that instead and it's plug and play.
Out of curiosity, what's your stack? Next.js with MDX in the repo, or a headless CMS? If there's demand I'd look at a proper Git integration.