MagnaLaunch
MVP development for non-technical entrepreneurs and teams.
4 followers
MVP development for non-technical entrepreneurs and teams.
4 followers
MagnaLaunch exists to help non-technical founders, entrepreneurs, and teams turn their vision into real, launch-ready MVP. Payment is 50% upfront and 50% three months after delivery — so they have time to generate revenue from the MVP.
We built MagnaLaunch to solve a common problem: many non-technical founders, entrepreneurs, and teams get stuck building a real, scalable MVP. Unlike other agencies, we combine expert consulting and development to deliver fast, reliable, and cost-effective launches.
What we’re most proud of is how quickly we can help teams go from idea to live product without the usual technical headaches, making the process accessible even for those without coding skills.
Payment is 50% upfront and 50% three months after delivery — to have time to generate revenue from the MVP.
Most “idea guys” don’t need a cofounder — they need a kick in the... MVP
Sooo many non-technical founders spend months chasing cofounders, hiring flaky freelancers, or tweaking no-code tools, and still never ship.
You don’t need a CTO.
You don’t need to learn to code.
You just need a working MVP that solves a real problem, and man you need it fast.
Done-for-you MVP services are underrated. Not agencies, not hourly devs... but builders who audit your prototype, scope the core features, and hand over a launch-ready product you own.
Has anyone here used a service like that ?
Stop Begging Devs for Equity
Every day, a non-technical founder posts:
“I have a great idea, looking for a technical co-founder!”
Which means...
“I want someone to build my product for free and own half of it.”
You don’t need a CTO. You need a product.
Most MVPs don’t require a full-time engineer. They require a focused scope, brutal prioritization, and someone who can get a working version live, fast.
Instead of searching for your “technical soulmate,” do this:
Refine your problem until it’s razor-sharp.
Pay a pro to ship a functional MVP.
Validate, iterate, and then look for a long-term tech partner, if you even need one.
This way no one has to awkwardly negotiate equity before writing a single line of code.
Your startup idea isn’t worth 50%, but execution is...
MVP ≠ Mini Version of Your Final Product
Biggest mistake I see from early founders? They treat the MVP like a baby version of the full app. Same features, just... smaller.
Your MVP isn’t a product demo. It’s a problem test.
It should:
Solve one painful problem
For one specific user
In the simplest way possible
That means no dashboards, no onboarding flows, no settings menu. Just the core mechanic that proves your idea is worth building further.
You’re not building a product... You’re validating that someone gives a damn.
Most MVP dev shops disappear after delivery... we don’t.
One thing we've learned working with non-technical founders:
The real stress starts after the MVP goes live.
Bug fixes, questions, small changes... and suddenly you’re on your own.
That’s why we include 3 months of post-launch support with every MVP we build.
You get full ownership, yes... but also a team that sticks around.
Need help later? We offer on-demand updates without locking you into a subscription.
It’s a simple difference, but for non-technical teams, it matters.
Ship fast, but don’t get left behind.
Curious... how do you handle post-launch if you're not technical?
After the MVP: What do you really build next?
A lot of us finally ship an MVP, feel the pressure to “go real,” and freeze.
The question becomes:
Now what? Build the whole thing? Raise? Scale? Wait?
Truth is, the MVP isn’t the end... it’s just your first learning tool.
But founders often treat it like a half-built product instead of a running experiment.
Here’s what’s worked for some of the teams we’ve helped post-MVP:
They ask: What do I need to learn next? not what do I build next?
They test next steps with real usage, not assumptions
They use light simulations, not heavy features, to validate behavior
They set budgets/time windows for learning sprints before building big
It’s easier said than done... especially when customers expect polish. But pushing too fast into “real product mode” can kill you.
How did you decide what to build after your MVP? Was it data, instinct, pressure… or just survival?