Launched this week
m2w.ai AI Manga Editor
Editor-grade feedback for your manga in minutes
18 followers
Editor-grade feedback for your manga in minutes
18 followers
M2W is an AI manga editor built for creators who need useful feedback before they publish or submit. Upload a storyboard, draft, or finished pages and receive scores plus actionable critiques on Pacing, Hook, Character, Visual Flow, and Dialogue Density in about 2 minutes. Unlike AI art generators, M2W does not create or replace your work, we help users improve it. Your manga stays private, IP remains yours, and is never used to train generative image models.
honestly this looks really useful, finally something that helps with the actual storytelling side rather than just generating art. one thing though, could you add a way to compare scores across multiple drafts of the same chapter? like a small history view so creators can see if their pacing score actually improved between revisions. would make the feedback loop way more useful.
@pakize177947 Thank you! Yes, we focus on the support of manga creators rather than generation. I didn't include it in the description but we already have that feature implemented. Users are able to tell if their work got better or not, as well as our revision and reevaluation data holds all the previous data to give a more critical feedback on how their works improved or not.
honestly this looks really useful for solo creators, the pacing and hook scores would save me so much guesswork before submitting to editors. one thing that would be clutch is a panel-by-panel feedback toggle so you can see exactly which page is dragging instead of just an overall score. that would make the actionable critiques way more precise.
@fatih915449 Thanks! And yes, most manga creators are solo without editors so hope help them all out. Actually we do have a page by page/ panel by panel feedback already. We indicate which panels needs improvements and plan to have pointers or highlights to make it more easily noticeable for users.
honestly this looks super useful for getting unbiased feedback before submitting, the privacy angle is a big plus too. one thing that would be nice is a way to compare two versions of the same page side by side after applying suggestions, basically so you can see if your edits actually moved the scores in the right direction. would make the feedback loop way more actionable.
@zgrpayc06lc Thanks for the feedback! And yes, usually manga artists are only seen by one or few manga editors before debut and afterwards only one on one with designated editor so its hard when they don't click. Some of our users are professional serialized manga artists with editor already and they still prefer to use our service. The 2 page comparison is a great approach! We will try to figure out how we can do this on mobile version as well since not all users are on desktop.
It would be really helpful if M2W could highlight which specific panels triggered a low score on pacing or visual flow, not just give an overall number. Knowing exactly which page or sequence is dragging would save a ton of guesswork during revision.
@srazgencilswsc Thanks for the feedback! Inside of our AI review comments we generate low, medium, high priorities along with 5 categories (Pacing, Hook, Character, Visual Flow, and Dialogue Density) listed so users can choose which page/panels they want to improve on.
The readability scores are useful, but it would be great if the dialogue density critique could highlight specific panels where the text feels too cramped. That way I know exactly which balloons to resize or split, rather than just getting a general warning.
@berkekanatrqdx Thanks for the feedback! Yes, sounds like a good idea. We will consider marking the specific areas for users to understand easily.
Ran a draft chapter through it and the pacing critique actually pointed out a slow middle section I had been blind to. Useful for self-editing without handing your work over to some art generator.
@damlakplapkz05 Thanks for trying it out! Hiring professional editors can be costly especially for multiple revisions and social media doesn't give critical feedback so glad we can be of help.