Launching today

Loopvalid
Validate any SaaS idea. Agents do the grunt work.
7 followers
Validate any SaaS idea. Agents do the grunt work.
7 followers
Loopvalid runs a full demand-validation protocol on any SaaS idea: research, landing page, real cold-traffic ads, signup capture, and a build/pivot/kill verdict. Credit packs from $29. No subscription. Real ads on your accounts, real signals, your data.






Linchpin
Hey PH š ā Nikhil, the maker.
I've built three startups. Two of them failed because I committed a quarter to ideas I should've killed in week one. The pattern was always the same: I'd "validate" by talking to a few friends, lurking on Reddit, and convincing myself the demand was real. Then I'd build for three months and ship to crickets.
Loopvalid is the tool I wish I'd had. You submit an idea. An agent does the demand research, picks a positioning angle (you pick which one), generates a landing page, drafts Google + Meta ad campaigns, and the page is live capturing signups against real cold traffic. Then a verdict agent synthesizes everything into a build/pivot/kill recommendation grounded in actual click and signup data.
What it actually is:
⢠5-stage pipeline (research ā angle ā landing page ā ads ā verdict)
⢠You approve every step ā you're in approval mode, not execution mode
⢠Real ads on your own Google/Meta accounts ($50-500 user-controlled spend)
⢠Real signups land in your dashboard with UTM attribution
⢠Credit-pack pricing ($29 single / $79 3-pack / $249 10-pack ā no subscription)
Honest tradeoffs in v1:
⢠It's signal, not certainty. A "build" verdict means "demand is real" ā you still have to ship the product.
⢠Ad-spend budget is on you. We don't take a cut of your spend; you connect your own accounts.
⢠Google Ads connection is wired; Meta is on the roadmap.
I'd love to hear from founders who've shipped to crickets ā what would've changed your decision in week one?
ā https://loopvalid.com