
LLMagnet
Make your WordPress site visible to AI
364 followers
Make your WordPress site visible to AI
364 followers
LLMagnet gives WordPress sites an AI visibility layer. Track visits from ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and other AI crawlers, measure your AI Visibility Score, generate llms.txt and structured data, and make your site readable and actionable for AI agents.











Just Sign
Been poking at bot logs on a couple WP installs and honestly the GPTBot / ClaudeBot / OAI-SearchBot split is messier than most SEO tools make it look. Half the time the URLs that matter aren’t even the ones getting hit. How are you surfacing that without drowning in raw access logs? Is Visibility Score more of a readiness checklist, or closer to “these bots actually reached X”?
LLMagnet
@ron_fybish1 Hey Ron, the score is closer to a readiness checklist. It helps you spot what needs work on your site, while crawler tracking shows the visits we’ve recorded in WordPress, without having to dig through raw logs.
That distinction matters: a page can score well and still get little crawler activity. And a recorded visit doesn’t mean the page was indexed or cited in an AI answer. Appreciate you bringing this up, it’s something we should make clearer on the launch page.
LLMagnet
@ron_fybish1 You’re describing exactly the mess we built for.
LLMagnet doesn’t dump raw access logs. It identifies AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, OAI-SearchBot, and others), then shows which bots hit you and which URLs they actually reached - so you can see whether the money pages are getting crawled or just thin archives.
Visibility Score is the readiness side, not crawl reach. It’s a checklist of whether your content is set up for AI access and understanding. Crawler activity is tracked separately, so a high score doesn’t mean “bots reached X,” and a crawler hit doesn’t mean ChatGPT recommended you.
If you’ve got those WP installs handy, install the free plugin and tell me what shows up first - bots you expected, or pages you didn’t want hit.
Congrats on shipping this. Feels like one of those “why didn’t this exist earlier?” tools for WordPress people.
Quick question for the room: if you could only show a client ONE screenshot about AI discovery on their site, what would it be?
LLMagnet
@daniel_wishnia Thanks Daniel! My pick would be the Bot Analytics view attached here. It answers a concrete first question for a client, which crawlers are reaching my site, how often, and how is that changing over time?
The next step would be checking which pages they access, particularly whether they’re reaching the product and service pages that matter to the business.
I’d also explain what this screenshot doesn’t tell us..a crawler visit isn’t proof of a mention or recommendation in an AI answer. It’s evidence of crawl activity, and a useful starting point for deciding what to investigate next.
Unboxable
@ido_navarro1 @bencohen congrats on the launch!!!! 👏 the thing I'd most want to know is the gap between crawled and cited - which pages AI bots read constantly and still never surface in an answer. That's the gap that nothing really shows today. plus // didn't expect the MCP connector; pulling the visibility data into Claude directly instead of exporting dashboards is a nice touch. onwards!! you rock.
LLMagnet
@ido_navarro1 @galrubinx Hey buddy! Fair point, being crawled doesn’t mean you’re actually getting cited. We can show what bots access today, but connecting that to actual citations is still a gap. Glad you noticed the MCP connector too! Appreciate you showing up for us 🙌
Love the timing on this launch. A lot of marketers I know still talk about ChatGPT like it’s magic, almost nobody talks about whether the site is even readable to these systems.
For makers here: what’s the first “wait, AI is already on my site?” moment you’ve had, if any?
LLMagnet
@guy_karolizki Thanks Guy! :) We spend hours moving a button three pixels to the left, then forget to check if a crawler can even read what we’re selling 😅 that’s the part I want to make easier for site owners. Before 'does ChatGPT recommend us?'..let’s see what it can actually access.
Dial
genuinely curious about the "AI Visibility Score" - is that measuring something you can verify against real crawler logs, or is it more of a heuristic/composite number? the risk with any new "score" product is it becomes a vanity metric people chase without it actually correlating to whether ChatGPT or Claude surfaces their site in an answer. how do you validate that the score moving up actually means more real AI referrals, not just better llms.txt hygiene?
LLMagnet
@galdayan Good question - and you’re right to be wary of vanity scores.
Our Visibility Score is a readiness / hygiene checklist for AI access and understanding (structure, page health, content clarity, etc.). It is NOT “will ChatGPT or Claude cite you,” and it is NOT validated against AI referrals. Crawler activity is tracked separately from the score.
So a higher score means the site is in better shape for models to read - not that referrals went up. If that distinction isn’t clear in the product, that’s on us to fix.
Dial
@ido_navarro1 appreciate the straight answer, especially the "that's on us to fix" part rather than defending the current copy. separating crawler tracking from the score itself seems like the right call architecturally - would just make that split visible in the dashboard UI itself, not only in a comment thread, since most users won't ask the question I did.
ABcommerce by Dialogue
We’ve been using LLMagnet for a while now and it’s become a really useful part of how we look at AI visibility on our WordPress site. Simple, clear, and actually gives us insights we can act on. Congrats on the launch
LLMagnet
@katzomri Thanks, Omri! Glad it’s become part of how you approach AI visibility on the site. What was the first actionable insight for you? A bot you didn’t expect, or a money page that barely got hit?
LLMagnet
@katzomri Thanks, Omri! Really glad the insights are helping you make changes on your site. Appreciate you using LLMagnet and taking the time to support the launch 🙌
Congrats on the launch!! this is exactly the blind spot I’m feeling.
my site is on Webflow, not WordPress. Is there a way for non-WP sites to see the same data or is this WP-only for now? If there’s a workaround you’d recommend in the meantime?