Launched this week
LiveReview
Free, Risk-Aware Code Review: Auto Approve Low-Risk Changes
348 followers
Free, Risk-Aware Code Review: Auto Approve Low-Risk Changes
348 followers
Most AI review tools flag issues. LiveReview promises production results: fewer incidents, fewer rollbacks, less senior reviewer load. Every PR is risk-scored. The lowest-risk 30-50% are safely auto-approved; the risky ones go straight to the engineers who should see them. The approach is inspired by Meta's highly successful internal AI review system, where production incidents fell 50x and rollbacks 3x. LLM + incident-trained ML + code-graph analysis. Free and self-hostable.
Free Options
Launch Team
Render Sandboxes: a computer for every agentIsolated compute, persistent state and a real filesystem
Promoted
auto-approving the low-risk PRs is the useful part. when it routes a riskier one, does the engineer see the risk score breakdown or just a flag?
@neerajnathany Detailed risk score is available; almost every piece of the final result can be inspected. This is useful for tweaking the system over time.
most review bots just spam nits on every pr and people stop reading them. risk scoring first feels like the right order. does the auto-approve play nice with branch protection or do you still need a human check to merge?
@farnabaz Hi Ahad, thanks for taking the time to leave a comment.
Presently, we merely auto approve, not auto merge. Essentially the review becomes mergeable without any further efforts. Would you like to have this kind of push into protected branch powers? Will consider adding it if you believe that's helpful
@shrsv I think that would be really helpful. ideally, a configurable one so maintainers can control. not all low-risk PRs are good to auto-merge but when it comes from a trusted contributor I can trust it.
@farnabaz Got it, makes sense. As to trust -- we do have trust levels (intern gets say level 1, a senior might be level 3, etc -- it's just a sequence). I will add this auto merge for trusted contributors as you've suggested in the next iteration. Thank you!
cool launch, congrats!! if a one-line config change hits the payments path, does LiveReview flag it from the code graph or could it get auto approved as low risk?
@igorblink thanks for engaging. For things such as auth, security and payments -- it'll catch things as high risk and flag it for humans for review.
Each organization can also define it's risk appetite as a percentile, so a regulated enterprise can have a conservative setting whereas a startup can take more aggressive risks and our tool helps each org set the risk threshold they wish to take on.
There are also individual sliders for various risk dimensions in correctness, compliance, security, performance, scaling, cloud costs, etc.
@shrsv amazing :)
Auto approving the lowest risk third and sending everything else to the right engineer is the version of this that would survive a real Monday, since another tool that flags fifty things a day just trains us to ignore it.
@karimbenkeroum Perfectly captured, Kareem. It's due to the increase in number of PR and also size of each PR, attention is at a premium. Attention must be guarded and directed at the most important parts that deserve it.