LitSynth: Review literature with evidence you can inspect

Hi everyone — Ryan from the LitSynth team here. We built LitSynth because finding papers and writing a review often happen in separate places. It becomes easy to lose track of why a paper was included, or which source supports a sentence. We wanted that trail to stay close to the draft. Our demo focuses on a small but important decision: a paper looks relevant, but is it actually useful for this question? You can inspect the study population, read available passages, and open the original source before deciding. The result is a more visible path from candidate papers to a draft you can check. LitSynth connects discovery, screening, and cited drafting. It does not turn a plausible answer into established evidence. The video is an edited saved screen capture, not a completed systematic review or proof of exhaustive retrieval. Researchers still check the sources, study methods, and conclusions. When you review a candidate paper, what do you need to see before you trust an inclusion decision? We would love to hear what makes that step difficult in your current workflow.