KillBounce
Email verifier that actually handles catch-all domains
9 followers
Email verifier that actually handles catch-all domains
9 followers
Three-layer email verification with a real SMTP probe not regex pretending. Built because the $80/month tools couldn't handle catch-all domains on Google Workspace (anti-enumeration tricks every regex-and-DNS approach into a false "accept all"). KillBounce opens a live SMTP session with the recipient server and reads the actual response. $4 per 1,000 credits. Pay-as-you-go. Credits never expire. Public legal stack at /trust for procurement.
Hey Product Hunt 👋
I built KillBounce after getting tired of paying $80+/month for email verification tools that still let bad emails slip through.
The biggest problem? Catch-all domains.
Most verifiers see a catch-all domain, label it "Valid" with high confidence, and move on. Then your campaign goes out, hard bounces pile up, and your sender reputation takes the hit.
KillBounce goes deeper.
Instead of stopping at syntax checks and DNS records, it opens a real SMTP conversation with the receiving server and analyzes how the server actually behaves. That means better detection of risky, catch-all, and undeliverable emails before you send.
✅ Syntax, DNS & MX validation
✅ Live SMTP verification
✅ Better catch-all detection
✅ No monthly subscription
✅ Credits never expire
Pricing starts at just $4 for 1,000 verifications.
I'd love feedback on:
🔹 Is the pricing simple and fair?
🔹 Does the catch-all explanation make sense?
🔹 Is our Trust page useful for security reviews, or unnecessary?
🎁 First 100 Product Hunt commenters get 1,000 free credits just leave a comment and I'll DM you the details.
Try it instantly:
https://www.getkillbounce.com
Looking forward to hearing what you think 🙏
@nikhil_chaudhary21 I'm currently using another verification tool that costs around $100–200/month, and compared to that, your pricing is significantly lower for the volume I'm looking at.
How are you able to maintain the same level of accuracy at this price point? Not skeptical at all—just genuinely curious about how you're able to keep costs so much lower while delivering comparable verification quality.
@pragati_jabali
Honestly, a big part of it is that we've spent a lot of time building and optimizing our own systems, which keeps our costs much lower than many providers in the space.
Instead of using that efficiency to increase margins, we use it to offer better pricing to customers. So the goal isn't to be cheaper by cutting corners it's to be more efficient while still delivering reliable verification results.